Везде
WHY RUSSIA AND THE UNITED STATES DO NOT UNDERSTAND EACH OTHER
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
WHY RUSSIA AND THE UNITED STATES DO NOT UNDERSTAND EACH OTHER
Annotation
PII
S013038640000487-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vladimir Sogrin  
Affiliation:
Edition
Issue 2
Pages
82-92
Abstract
The author entering in the discussion with the American researcher A. Stent examines Russian-American relations of 1990-es - 2010-es. The main cause of conflict between the two powers he sees in fact that Washington accepts Moscow only as a client of it’s imperial leadership. Russia does not accept such role strongly holding to sovereign foreign policy. USA on their part don’t understand the obstinacy of the country defeated as they believe in the cold war.
Keywords
RUSSIAN-AMERICAN RELATIONS, THE IMPERIAL LEADERSHIP OF THE USA, FOREIGN POLICY SOVEREIGNTY OF RUSSIA
Date of publication
01.03.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1387
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


 Stent A. Pochemu Amerika i Rossiya ne slyshat drug druga. Vzglyad Vashingtona na novejshuyu istoriyu rossijsko-amerikanskikh otnoshenij. M., 2015.
 Stent A.E. The Limits of Partnership. U.S.-Russian Relations in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton - Oxford, 2014.
 Blum U. Ubijstvo demokratii. Operatsii TsRU i Pentagona v period kholodnoj vojny. M., 2013;
 Stoun O., Kuznik P. Nerasskazannaya istoriya SShA. M., 2015.
 Sogrin V.V. Vneshnyaya politika Dzh. Busha-mladshego. Genezis. Ehvolyutsiya. Itogi. - Novaya i novejshaya istoriya, 2014, № 2, s. 92-111     
 Sogrin V.V. SShA v KhKh-KhKhI vekakh. Liberalizm. Demokratiya. Imperiya. M., 2015, s. 400-544;
 Sogrin V.V. Amerikanskaya imperiya kak istoricheskij i sovremennyj fenomen. - Novaya i novejshaya istoriya, 2016, № 3, s. 91-109.    
 Ehrman J. The Rise of Neoconservatism. Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs 1945- 1994. New Haven - London, 1995, p. 181-188
 Bacevich A. American Empire. Cambridge (Mass.), 2002, p. 2-5; Abbot P. Political Thought in America. Long Grove (Ill.), 2005, p. 335-336;
 Batalov Eh.A. Mirovoe razvitie i mirovoj poryadok. Analiz sovremennykh amerikanskikh kontseptsij. M., 2005, s. 320-348;
 Rakhshmir P.Yu. Amerikanskie konservatory i imperskaya ideya. Perm', 2007; The Paradox of a Global USA. Stanford (Cf), 2007, p. 25;         
 Pearson M.L. Perils of Empire. The Roman Empire and the American Republic. New York, 2008, p. 3.
 Goldgejr Dzh., Makfol M. Tsel' i sredstva. Politika SShA v otnoshenii Rossii posle «kholodnoj vojny». M., 2009, s. 17, 228.
 Statement of Principles, June 3, 1997. - http.//www. Newamericancentury.org.
 Krauthammer C. The Unipolar Moment Revisited. - The National Interest, Winter 2002/2003, p. 5-17.
 Kejgan R. Sila i slabost'. - Pro et Contra, 2002, № 4, s. 129, 135, 133 (Kagan R. Power and Weakness. - Policy Review, 2002, № 113).
 Brzezinsky Z. The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy and Its Geostratigic Imperatives. New York, 1997.
 Bzhezinskij Z. Velikaya shakhmatnaya doska. Amerikanskoe prevoskhodstvo i ego strategicheskie imperativy. M., 2010, s. 37-38.
 Lundestad G. Empire by Invitation? - The United States and the Western Europe, 1945-1952. SHARF Newsletter, September 1984, № 15
 Lundestad G. Vostok, Zapad, Sever, Yug. Osnovnye napravleniya mezhdunarodnoj politiki. 1945-1996. M., 2002, s. 14.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate