Везде
PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS OF CHOICE AND CHANGE OF THE ACTION STRATEGY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS OF CHOICE AND CHANGE OF THE ACTION STRATEGY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000392-8-
DOI
10.31857/S20000392-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
E. Rasskazova 
Abstract
The paper discusses opportunities of a theoretical approach that considers choice as irreducible to the decision making. Psychological content and experience of choice are emphasized. We suggest to take into account in empirical research both formal and content characteristics of the choice as well as its development within the time, including a change of choice after negative feedback - both direct (the failure to achieve the main goal) and indirect (implicit failure of the other goals that are not main for the task) ones. The aim was to study choice and change of action strategy in the task (that is presented as a game) after indirect negative feedback in two different condition. In the experiment we asked 170 students of psychological majors to choose an action strategy (quantity of “energy” to invest in achieving the goal) in a game situation on the computer. In the neutral condition (“simple choice”) final goal was formulated as a win for the character (young man achieving his career goals). In the motivating condition (“meaningful choice”) participants were asked to play the role of a psychologist who helps the character to achieve goals that are important for him. In the motivating condition, in contrast to neutral one, the task was perceived as more difficult; respondents tended to change the chosen action strategy readily after indirect negative feedback (success against the main goal, but the implicit failure in the overall reduction of “energy”). In the neutral condition psychological factors of self-regulation (planning; reflective orientation in the planning and failure; acceptance, rumination, focusing on the problem, positive reappraisal as strategies of cognitive regulation of emotions) predicted the stability of choice. In the motivating condition focusing on the problem, positive reappraisal, and reflective orientation in failure were associated with confidence in the choice made, but not with its stability.
Keywords
Psychology of choice, change of action strategy, stability of the decision, cognitive regulation of emotions, self-regulation of behavior, action control
Number of purchasers
1
Views
568
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000392-8-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 14.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Vasilyuk F.E. Psikhotekhnika vybora // Psikhologiya s chelovecheskim litsom: gumanisticheskaya perspektiva v postsovetskoj psikhologii / Pod red. D.A. Leont'eva, V.G. Schur. M.: Smysl, 1997. S. 284-314.
    2. 

  2. Dorfman L.Ya., Baleva M.V. Vzaimosvyaz' kreativnosti i variativnosti // Psikhol. zhurn. 2014. T. 35. № 2. S. 57-67.
    3. 

  3. Konopkin O.A. Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy samoregulyatsii deyatel'nosti. M.: Lenand, 2011.
    4. 

  4. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A., Kornilov S.A., Novikova M.A. Psikhologiya neopredelennosti: edinstvo intellektual'no-lichnostnogo potentsiala cheloveka. M.: Smysl, 2010.
    5. 

  5. Leont'ev D.A. Psikhologiya vybora. Chast' I. Za predelami ratsional'nosti // Psikhol. zhurn. 2014. T. 35. № 5. S. 5-18.
    6. 

  6. Leont'ev D.A., Mandrikova E.Yu., Fam A.Kh. Razrabotka metodiki diagnostiki protsessual'noj storony vybora // Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika. 2007. № 6. S. 4-25.
    7. 

  7. Leont'ev D.A., Pilipko N.V. Vybor kak deyatel'nost': lichnostnye determinanty i vozmozhnosti formirovaniya // Vopr. psikhol. 1995. № 1. S. 97-110.
    8. 

  8. Leont'ev D.A., Fam A.Kh. Kak my vybiraem: struktury perezhivaniya sobstvennogo vybora i ikh svyaz' s kharakteristikami lichnosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya. 2011. № 1. S. 39-53.
    9. 

  9. Mamardashvili M.K. Lektsii o Pruste (psikhologicheskaya topologiya puti). M.: Ad Marginem, 1995.
    10. 

  10. Mitina O.V., Rasskazova E.I. Refleksivnaya orientatsiya i ee diagnostika v strukture kontrolya za dejstviem // Psikhol. zhurn. 2014. T. 35. № 2. S. 118-128.
    11. 

  11. Morosanova V.I. Individual'nyj stil' samoregulyatsii: fenomen, struktura i funktsii v proizvol'noj aktivnosti cheloveka. M.: Nauka, 2001.
    12. 

  12. Morosanova V.I. Stil' samoregulyatsii povedeniya (SSPM). Rukovodstvo. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2004.
    13. 

  13. Morosanova V.I., Indina T.A. Regulyatornye i lichnostnye osnovy prinyatiya reshenij. M.-SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2011.
    14. 

  14. Nestik T.A. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya vremeni: sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovanij // Psikhol. zhurn. 2014.T. 35. № 3. S. 5-19.
    15. 

  15. Rasskazova E.I., Leonova A.B., Pluzhnikov I.V. Razrabotka russkoyazychnoj versii oprosnika kognitivnoj regulyatsii ehmotsij // Vestnik psikhologii. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya. 2011. № 4. S. 161-179.
    16. 

  16. Tillikh P. Muzhestvo byt' / V kn.: P. Tillikh. Izbrannoe. M.: Yurist, 1995. S. 7-131.
    17. 

  17. Bragger J.D., Hantula D.A., Bragger D., Kirnan J., Kutcher E. When success breeds failure: History, hysteresis, and delayed exit decisions / Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2003. № 88. P. 6-14.
    18. 

  18. Carver C. S., Scheier M. F. On the self-regulation of behavior. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
    19. 

  19. Hall P.A., Fong G.Y. Temporal self-regulation theory: a model for individual health behavior // Health Psychology Review. 2007. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 6-52.
    20. 

  20. Henderson M., Gollwitzer P, Oettingen G. Implementation Intention and Disangagement from Failing Course of Action // Journ. of Behavior Decision Making. 2007. № 20. P. 81-102.
    21. 

  21. Ouellette J.A., Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior // Psychological Bulletin. 1998. Vol. 124. № 1. P. 54-74.
    22. 

  22. Zimbardo P.G., Boyd J.N. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999. Vol. 77. № 6. P. 1271-1288.
    23.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate