Везде
STUDY OF IMPLICIT THEORIES AS COMPONENTS OF COGNITIVE RISK
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
STUDY OF IMPLICIT THEORIES AS COMPONENTS OF COGNITIVE RISK
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
E. M. Ordinova 
Abstract
The results of study demonstrating possibility of risk implicit theories diagnostics by means of new psychometrically verifi ed questionnaire “Implicit Theories of Risk” (ITR) are presented. Questionnaire ITR,“Tolerance to Uncertainty” questionnaire (TUQ) and Risk Readiness Survey (RRS) were given to 744probationers. Seven variables regarded as ITR basis were evolved as a result; correlation between ITRpreferences has been shown. Correlations between subjective ideas about risk – ITR – with personal variables are described.
Keywords
implicit theories of risk, risk readiness, tolerance to uncertainty, cognitive risk, subjective representation of risk, intellectual and personal potential.
Date of publication
03.01.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
439
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000616-4-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 05.11.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Bek U. Ot industrial'nogo obschestva k obschestvu riska // Al'manakh THESIS. Risk, neopredelennost', sluchajnost'. 1994. № 5. S. 161-184.
    2. 

  2. Bruner Dzh. Psikhologiya poznaniya. M.: Progress, 1977.
    3. 

  3. Kaneman D., Slovik P., Tverski A. Prinyatie reshenij v neopredelyonnosti. M.: Genezis, 2005.
    4. 

  4. Kornilova T.V. Mnogomernost' faktora sub'ektivnogo riska (v verbal'nykh situatsiyakh prinyatiya reshenij) // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 1998. № 6. S. 40-51.
    5. 

  5. Kornilova T.V. Novyj oprosnik tolerantnosti k neopredelennosti // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2010. T. 31. №1. S. 74-86.
    6. 

  6. Kornilova T.V. Psikhologiya riska i prinyatiya reshenij. M.: Aspekt Press, 2003.
    7. 

  7. Kornilova T.V., Tikhomirov O.K. Prinyatie intellektual'nykh reshenij v dialoge s komp'yuterom. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1990.
    8. 

  8. Kornilova T.V., Chigrinova I.A. Stadii individual'noj morali i prinyatie neopredelyonnosti v regulyatsii lichnostnykh vyborov // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2012. № 2. S. 24-55.
    9. 

  9. Kornilova T.V., Chudina T. V. Lichnostnye i situatsionnye faktory prinyatiya reshenij v usloviyakh dialoga s EhVM // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 1990. T. 11. № 4. S. 32-37.
    10. 

  10. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A., Kornilov S.A., Novikova M.A. Psikhologiya neopredelyonnosti: edinstvo intellektual'no-lichnostnogo potentsiala cheloveka. M.: Smysl, 2010.
    11. 

  11. Lomov B.F. Matematika i psikhologiya v izuchenii protsessov prinyatiya reshenij // Normativnye i deskriptivnye modeli prinyatiya reshenij / Pod red. B.F. Lomova i dr. M.: Nauka, 1981.
    12. 

  12. Petrenko V.F. Vvedenie v ehksperimental'nuyu psikhosemantiku: issledovanie form reprezentatsii v obydennom soznanii. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1983.
    13. 

  13. Tikhomirov O.K. Struktura myslitel'noj deyatel'nosti. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1969.
    14. 

  14. Ehrrou K. Vospriyatie riska v psikhologii i ehkonomicheskoj nauke // Al'manakh THESIS. Risk, neopredelennost', sluchajnost'. 1994. №5. S. 81-90.
    15. 

  15. Furnham A. Lay theories: Everyday understanding of problems in the social sciences. NY: Pergamon, 1988.
    16. 

  16. Snelbecker G.E., McConologue T., Feldman J.M. Cognitive risk tolerance. Survey, 2009.
    17. 

  17. Stone Eric R., Allgainer L. A Social Values Analysis of Self-Other Differences in Decision Making Involving Risk // Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2008. V. 30. R. 114-129.
    18. 

  18. Weber Elke U., Figner B. Who Takes Risks When and Why? Determinants of Risk Taking // Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011. V. 20. № 4. P. 211-216.
    19.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate