DEDICATED IMPERSONAL IN OSSETIC: TOWARDS A TYPOLOGY OF IMPERSONALITY IN IRANIAN
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
DEDICATED IMPERSONAL IN OSSETIC: TOWARDS A TYPOLOGY OF IMPERSONALITY IN IRANIAN
Annotation
PII
S0373-658X0000339-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
20-33
Abstract
The article is devoted to dedicated subject impersonal in Iranian languages. By subject impersonal I understand the verbal category that removes A-participant. I argue that the only Iranian language that has verbal impersonal is Ossetic (Eastern Iranian). I explore morphological, syntactic and semantic peculiarities of the Ossetic impersonal. I argue that Ossetic impersonal is a unique category within Iranian and Caucasian language areal.
Keywords
actant derivation, areal linguistics, imperial languages, Iranian languages, Caucasian areal, Ossetian language, subject to
Number of purchasers
1
Views
546
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

Abaev 1949 – V.I. Abaev. Osetinskij yazyk i fol'klor. T. I. M.; L., 1949.

Abaev 1959 – V.I. Abaev. Grammaticheskij ocherk osetinskogo yazyka. Ordzhonikidze, 1959.

Ahvlediani 1963 – G.S. Ahvlediani (red.). Grammatika osetinskogo yazyka. T. I. Fonetika i morfologiya. Ordzhonikidze, 1963.

Bagaev 1965 – N.K. Bagaev. Sovremennyj osetinskij yazyk. CH. I. Fonetika i morfologiya. Ordzhonikidze, 1965.

Vydrin 2006 – A.P. Vydrin. Pryamoe dopolnenie i slozhnye glagoly v sovremennom persidskom yazyke: grammaticheskij i leksikograficheskij aspekty: Mag. dis. SPb., 2006. http://www.ossetic-studies.org/vydrin/index.php/publications/

Vydrin 2011 – A.P. Vydrin. Sistema modal'nosti osetinskogo yazyka v sopostavitel'nom osveshchenii: Dis. … kand. filol. nauk. SPb., 2011. http://www.ossetic-studies.org/vydrin/index.php/publications/

Gryunberg 1987 – A.L. Gryunberg. Ocherk grammatiki afganskogo yazyka (pashto). L., 1987.

Lander 2012 – YU.A. Lander. Relyativizaciya v polisinteticheskom yazyke: adygejskie otnositel'nye konstrukcii v tipologicheskoj perspektive: Dis. … kand. filol. nauk. M., 2012.

Plungyan 2011 – V.A. Plungyan. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: Grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira. M., 2011.

Rubinchik 2001 – YU.A. Rubinchik. Grammatika sovremennogo persidskogo literaturnogo yazyka. M., 2001.

Tommola 1998 – H. Tommola. Zametki k tipologii ambipersonala // N.A. Kozinceva, A.K. Ogloblin (red.). Tipologiya. Grammatika. Semantika. SPb., 1998.

Abaev 1964 – V.I. Abaev. A grammatical sketch of Ossetic. The Hague, 1964.

Belyaev, Vydrin 2011 – O. Belyaev, A. Vydrin. Participle-converbs in Iron Ossetic: Syntactic and semantic properties // A. Korn, G. Haig, S. Karimi, P. Samvelian (eds). Topics in Iranian linguistics. Wiesbaden, 2011.

Bhatt, Pancheva 2006 – R. Bhatt, R. Pancheva. Implicit arguments // M. Everaert, H. van Riemsdijk (eds). The Blackwell companion to syntax. V. II. Oxford, 2006.

Blevins 2003 – J.P. Blevins. Passives and impersonals // Journal of linguistics. 2003. V. 39.

Creissels 2008 – D. Creissels. Impersonal and related constructions: A typological approach. Lectures at the University of Tartu. Tartu, 2008.

Heston 1976 – W.L. Heston. Selected problems in fi fth to tenth century Iranian syntax. Unpublished PhD thesis. Philadelphia, 1976.

Jahani et al. 2010 – C. Jahani et al. Impersonal constructions in Balochi // Orientalia suecana. 2010. V. 59.

Malchukov, Siewerska 2011 – A. Malchukov, A. Siewierska (eds). Impersonal constructions: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 2011.

Malchukov, Ogawa 2011 – A. Malchukov, A. Ogawa. Towards a typology of impersonal constructions: A semantic map approach // A. Malchukov, A. Siewierska (eds). Impersonal constructions: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 2011.

Nichols 2011 – J. Nichols. Ingush grammar. Berkeley, 2011.

Shokri 2010 – G. Shokri. Impersonal constructions in Mazandarani // Orientalia suecana. 2010. V. 59.

Siewerska 2008 – A. Siewierska. Introduction: Impersonalization: An agent-based vs. a subject-based perspective // Transactions of the Philological society. 2008. V. 106. № 2.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate