Везде
ON SOME ARGUABLE POINTS OF LAURA JANDAS ASPECTOLOGICAL THEORY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
ON SOME ARGUABLE POINTS OF LAURA JANDAS ASPECTOLOGICAL THEORY
Annotation
PII
S0373-658X0000375-5-1
DOI
10.31857/SX0000375-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Irina Mikaelian  Anna Zalizniak
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
48-65
Abstract
The article offers a critical analysis of the theoretical approach to the Russian aspectual system developed by Laura Janda and her coauthors in a series of publications, including the article published in the present issue of the journal «Voprosy jazykoznanija». It is shown that this approach, based on the premises of cognitive grammar, has a number of conceptual and methodological fl aws. Arguments for an alternative view on the discussed problems, in particular, in defense of the concept of «aspectual pair», rejected by Janda, are provided. The paper also contains a large original material on «apectual triplets». We recognize the imortant contribution of Laura Janda and her group to the development of the Russian aspectual data base with corpora-based methods. Nevertheless, we propose ways of integrating results across various methodological approaches.
Keywords
Aspectology, aspectual pair, prefi xation, perfectivization, imperfectivization, Maslov criterion, simplex imperfective, secondary imperfective, aspectual triplet, aspectual data base, cognitive approach, functional approach, corpora-based approach
Number of purchasers
1
Views
614
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

Apresyan 1995 – YU.D. Apresyan. Traktovka izbytochnyh aspektual'nyh paradigm v tolkovom slovare // YU.D. Apresyan. Izbrannye trudy. T. II. M., 1995.
Gorbova 2011 – E.V. Gorbova. Vidovaya parnost' russkogo glagola: problemy i resheniya // VYA. 2011. № 4.
Dobrushina i dr. 2001 – E.R. Dobrushina, E.A. Mellina, D. Pajar (red.). Russkie pristavki: mnogoznachnost' i semanticheskoe edinstvo. M., 2001.
Zaliznyak 1995 – Anna A. Zaliznyak. Opyt modelirovaniya semantiki pristavochnyh glagolov v russkom yazyke // Russian linguistics. 1995. V. 19. № 2.
Zaliznyak 2001 – Anna A. Zaliznyak. Semanticheskaya derivaciya v znachenii pristavki u- // Glagol'nye prefiksy i prefiksal'nye glagoly. Moskovskij lingvisticheskij zhurnal. 2001. T. 5. № 1.
Zaliznyak, Mikaelyan 2007 – Anna A. Zaliznyak, I.L. Mikaelyan. Vidovye trojki v russkoj aspektual'noj sisteme // Russkij yazyk: istoricheskie sud'by i sovremennost'. III Mezhdunar. kongress issledovatelej russkogo yazyka (Moskva, MGU, 20–23 marta 2007 g.) Trudy i materialy. M., 2007.
Zaliznyak, Mikaelyan 2010 – Anna A. Zaliznyak, I.L. Mikaelyan. O meste vidovyh troek v russkoj aspektual'noj sisteme // Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii. Trudy Mezhdunar. konf. «Dialog’2010». Bekasovo, 26–30 maya 2010. M., 2010.
Zaliznyak, Mikaelyan 2011 – Anna A. Zaliznyak, I.L. Mikaelyan. Rvat' zuby i myt' den'gi: ob odnom tipe upotrebleniya bespristavochnyh imperfektivov v russkom yazyke // Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii. Trudy Mezhdunar. konf. «Dialog’2011». Bekasovo, 25–29 maya 2011. M., 2011.
Zaliznyak i dr. 2010 – Anna A. Zaliznyak, I.L. Mikaelyan, A.D. SHmelev. Vidovaya korrelyativnost' v russkom yazyke: v zashchitu vidovoj pary // VYA. 2010. № 1.
Zaliznyak, SHmelev 2000 – Anna A. Zaliznyak, A.D. SHmelev. Vvedenie v russkuyu aspektologiyu. M., 2000.
Krongauz 1998 – M.A. Krongauz. Pristavki i glagoly v russkom yazyke: semanticheskaya grammatika. M., 1998.
Krongauz (red.) 2001 – M.A. Krongauz (red.). Glagol'nye prefiksy i prefiksal'nye glagoly. Moskovskij lingvisticheskij zhurnal. 2001. T. 5. № 1.
Krongauz, Pajar (red.) 1997 – M. Krongauz, D. Pajar (red.). Glagol'naya prefiksaciya v russkom yazyke. Sb. statej. M., 1997.
MAS – A.P. Evgen'eva (red.). Slovar' russkogo yazyka: V 4 t. 4-e izd. M., 1999.
Maslov 1948/2004 – YU.S. Maslov. Vid i leksicheskoe znachenie glagola v sovremennom russkom literaturnom yazyke // YU.S. Maslov. Izbrannye trudy. Aspektologiya i obshchee yazykoznanie. M., 2004.
Maslov 1977/2004 – YU.S. Maslov. Russkij glagol'nyj vid v zarubezhnom yazykoznanii poslednih let. II // YU.S. Maslov. Izbrannye trudy. Aspektologiya i obshchee yazykoznanie. M., 2004.
Maslov 1981/2004 – YU.S. Maslov. Funkcional'naya polnota i morfologicheskaya regulyarnost' vidovoj paradigmy // YU.S. Maslov. Izbrannye trudy. Aspektologiya i obshchee yazykoznanie. M., 2004.

3 Voprosy yazykoznaniya, № 6 65
Ozhegov, SHvedova 1998 – S.I. Ozhegov, N.YU. SHvedova. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka. 4-e izd. M., 1998.
Paducheva 1996 – E.V. Paducheva. Semanticheskie issledovaniya. M., 1996.
Pajar 1989 – D. Pajar. K teorii perfektivizacii // Logicheskij analiz yazyka. Problemy intensional'nyh i pragmaticheskih kontekstov. M., 1989.
Plungyan 2011 – V.A. Plungyan. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira. M., 2011.
Spagis 1969 – A.A. Spagis. Parnye i neparnye glagoly v russkom yazyke. M., 1969.
Tihonov 1998 – A.N. Tihonov. Russkij glagol. M., 1998.
YAnda 2012 – L.A. YAnda. Russkie pristavki kak sistema glagol'nyh klassifikatorov // VYA. 2012. № 6.


Bach 1986 – E. Bach. The algebra of events // Linguistics and philosophy. 1986. V. 9. № 1.
Cubberly 1982 – P.V. Cubberly. On the ‘empty’ prefi xes in Russian // Russian language journal. 1982. V. 36.
Guiraud-Weber 1988/2004 – M. Guiraud-Weber. L’Aspect du verbe russe: essais de présentation. 1988. 2-е изд.: Le verbe russe. Temps et aspect. Aix-en-Provence, 2004.
Janda 1986 – L. Janda. A semantic analysis of the Russian verbal prefi xes za-, pere-, do-, and ot- (Slavistische Beiträge. Bd. 192. 1986.)
Janda 2004 – L.A. Janda. A metaphor in search of a source domain: The categories of Slavic aspect // Cognitive linguistics. 2004. V. 15. № 4.
Janda 2007 – L.A. Janda. Aspectual clusters of Russian verbs // Studies in language. 2007. V. 31. № 3.
Janda, Lyashevskaya 2011a – L.A. Janda, O. Lyashevskaya. Prefi x variation as a challenge to Russian aspectual pairs: Are завязнуть and увязнуть ‘get stuck’ the same or different? // Russian linguistics. 2011. V. 35. № 2.
Janda, Lyashevskaya 2011b – L.A. Janda, O. Lyashevskaya. Aspectual pairs in the Russian National Corpus // Scando-Slavica. 2011. V. 57. № 2.
Janda, Nesset 2010 – L.A. Janda, T. Nesset. Taking apart Russian RAZ- // Slavic and East European journal. 2010. V. 54. № 3.
Mikaelian et al. 2007 – I. Mikaelian, A.D. Shmelev, Anna A. Zalizniak. Imperfectivization in Russian // Meaning-Text theory 2007. Proceedings of the 3rd International conference on meaning-text theory,
Klagenfurt, May 20–24, 2007. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach. Sbd. 69. München; Wien, 2007.
Mikaelian et al. 2008 – I. Mikaelian, A. Shmelev, Anna A. Zalizniak. Le concept de couple aspectuel est-il encore utile? // Questions de linguistique slave. Mélanges offertes à Marguerite GuiraudWeber. Aix-en-Provence, 2008.
Mikaelian, Zalizniak 2007 – I. Mikaelian, Anna A. Zalizniak. Why do triplets not compromise pairs? // Annual AATSEEL Meeting, December 27–30, 2007. Book of abstracts. Chicago, 2007.
Mikaelian, Zalizniak 2009 – I. Mikaelian, Anna A. Zalizniak. Functional types of aspectual triplets in Contemporary Russian // The Slavic cognitive linguistic conference (SCLC-2009). Prague, 15–17 October 2009. Book of abstracts.
Paillard 1991 – D. Paillard. Aspect et lexique: Preverbes et perfectivation en russe. Le preverbe ZA- // Bulletin de la linguistique generale et appliquée (BULAG). 1991. № 17.
Veyrenc 1980 – J. Veyrenc. Un problème de formes concurrentes dans l’economie de l’aspect verbal en russe : imperfectifs premiers et imprefectifs seconds // J. Veyrenc. Etudes sur le verbe russe. Paris, 1980.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate