Библиография

Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

Кибрик 1979 – А.Е. Кибрик. Подлежащее и проблема универсальной модели языка // ИАН СЛЯ. 1979. № 4.

Храковский (ред.) 2009 – В.С. Храковский (ред.). Типология таксисных конструкций. М., 2009.

Amberber 2009 – M. Amberber. Differential case marking of arguments in Amharic // A. Malchukov, A. Spencer (eds.). The Oxford handbook of case. Oxford, 2009.

Austin, Margetts 2007 – P. Austin, A. Margetts. Three participant events in the languages of the world: towards a crosslinguistic typology // Linguistics. V. 45. 2007. № 3.

Comrie 1978 – B. Comrie. Ergativity // W.P. Lehmann (ed.). Syntactic typology. Studies in the phenomenology of language. Austin; London, 1978.

Comrie 2003 – B. Comrie. Recipient person suppletion in the verb ‘give’ // M.R. Wise, Th.N. Headland, R.M. Bread (eds.). Language and life: Essays in memory of Kenneth L. Pike. Dallas, 2003.

Creissels 2010 – D. Creissels. Benefactive applicative periphrases: A typological approach // F. Zúñiga, S. Kittilä (eds.). Benefactives and malefactives. Typological perspectives and case studies. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 2010.

Croft 1990 – W. Croft. Typology and universals. Cambridge, 1990.

Dryer 1986 – M.S. Dryer. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative // Language. V. 62. 1986. № 4.

Fillmore 1968 – Ch. Fillmore. The case for case // E. Bach, R.T. Harms (eds.). Universals in linguistic theory. New York, 1968 (русск. пер.: Филлмор 1981/1968 – Ч. Филлмор. Дело о падеже // В.А. Звегинцев (ред.). Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. Х. Лингвистическая семантика. М., 1981).

Gensler 2003 – O. Gensler. Object ordering in verbs marking two pronominal objects: Nonexplanation and explanation // Linguistic typology. V. 7. 2003. № 2.

Haspelmath 2003 – M. Haspelmath. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison // M. Tomasello (ed.). The new psychology of language. V. II. Mahwah (NJ), 2003.

Haspelmath 2004 – M. Haspelmath. Explaining the ditransitive person-role constraint: A usage-based approach // Constructions. V. 2. 2004. (http://www.constructions-online.de/articles/35)

Haspelmath 2005a – M. Haspelmath. Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types // Linguistic discovery. V. 3. 2005. № 1. (http://journals.dartmouth.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Journals.woa/2/xmlpage/1/article/280)

Haspelmath 2005b – M. Haspelmath. Ditransitive constructions: The verb ‘give’ // M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil, B. Comrie (eds.). The World atlas of language structures. Oxford, 2005. (http://wals.info/chapter/105)

Haspelmath 2010 – M. Haspelmath. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies // Language. V. 86. 2010. № 3.

Haspelmath 2011 – M. Haspelmath. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Manuscript. 2011. (http://eva-mpg.academia.edu/MartinHaspelmath/Papers/)

Heine, König 2010 – B. Heine, Chr. König. On the linear order of ditransitive objects // Language sciences. V. 32. 2010.

Kittilä 2005 – S. Kittilä. Recipient prominence vs. benefi ciary prominence // Linguistic typology. V. 9. 2005. № 2.

Kittilä 2006a – S. Kittilä. The anomaly of the verb ‘give’ explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity // Linguistics. V. 44. 2006. № 3.

Kittilä 2006b – S. Kittilä. Object-, animacy- and role-based strategies: A typology of object marking // Studies in language. V. 30. 2006. № 1.

Kittilä 2006c – S. Kittilä. The woman showed the baby to her sister: on resolving animacydriven ambiguity in ditransitives // L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, H. de Hoop (eds.). Case, valency and transitivity. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 2006.

Kittilä 2008 – S. Kittilä. Animacy effects on differential goal marking // Linguistic typology. V. 12. 2008. № 2.

Rapold 2010 – Chr.J. Rapold. Benefi ciary and other roles of the dative in Tashelhiyt // F. Zúñiga, S. Kittilä (eds.). Benefactives and malefactives. Typological perspectives and case studies. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 2010.

Siewierska 2003 – A. Siewierska. Person agreement and the determination of alignment // Transactions of the philological society. V. 101. 2003. № 2.

Siewierska 2004 – A. Siewierska. Person. Cambridge, 2004.

Siewierska, Bakker 2007 – A. Siewierska, D. Bakker. Bound person forms in ditransitive clauses revisited // Functions of language. V. 14. 2007. № 1.

Zúñiga, Kittilä (eds.) 2010 – F. Zúñiga, S. Kittilä (eds.). Benefactives and malefactives. Typological perspectives and case studies. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 2010.