Везде
Review of the book: A. De Wit. The present perfective paradox across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Review of the book: A. De Wit. The present perfective paradox across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017
Annotation
PII
S0373658X0001402-1-1
DOI
10.31857/S0373658X0001402-1
Publication type
Review
Status
Published
Authors
Vladimir Plungian 
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Issue 5
Pages
131-136
Abstract

  

Received
08.10.2018
Date of publication
08.10.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
654
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References

1. Gusev V. Yu. Aspect in Nganasan. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 6: Tipologiya aspektual’nykh sistem i kategorii. (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy ILI RAN. Vol. 8. Part 2.). Golovko E. V., Daniel M. A., Plungian V. A., Semenova Ks. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2012. Pp. 311–360.

2. Zaliznyak A. A. On a certain use of praesens of the perfective verb («praesens of vain expectations»). Metody formalne w opisie języków słowiańskich. Saloni Z. (ed.). Białystok: W-wo Univ. Warszawskiego, 1990. Pp. 109–114.

3. Zaliznyak Anna A. Praesens of perfective verbs in the meaning of the present tense. Zaliznyak Anna A., Mikaelyan I. L., Shmelev A. D. Russkaya aspektologiya: V zashchitu vidovoi pary. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2015. Pp. 314–329.

4. Plungian V. A. Towards a typology of the perfect in the world’s languages. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 7: Perfekt i smezhnye kategorii. (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy ILI RAN. Vol. 12. Part 2.). Maisak T. A., Plungian V. A., Semenova Ks. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2016. Pp. 7–36.

5. Urmančieva A. Yu. Tense, aspect or modality? Verbal system of the Enets language. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 2006. No. 4. Pp. 84–100.

6. Shluinskii A. B. Factative and related categories: An attempt of typology. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 6: Tipologiya aspektual’nykh sistem i kategorii. (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy ILI RAN. Vol. 8. Part 2.). Golovko E. V., Daniel’ M. A., Plungian V. A., Semenova Ks. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2012. Pp. 950–996.

7. Bybee et al. 1994 — Bybee J. L., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1994.

8. Dickey 2000 — Dickey S. M. Parameters of Slavic aspect: A cognitive approach. Stanford (CA): CSLI, 2000.

9. Giorgi, Pianesi 1997 — Giorgi A., Pianesi F. Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997.

10. Malchukov 2009 — Malchukov A. Incompatible categories: Resolving the “present perfective paradox”. Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality. Hogeweg L., de Hoop H., Malchukov A. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009. Pp. 13–32.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate