DCC-GARCH-model for identifying long-term and short-term effects of financial contagion in response to the credit rating updates
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
DCC-GARCH-model for identifying long-term and short-term effects of financial contagion in response to the credit rating updates
Annotation
PII
S042473880014080-7-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Natalia Pivnickaya 
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation
Tamara Teplova
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation
Pages
113-123
Abstract

Abstract. Our research investigates the impact of potential and actual changes in the sovereign credit ratings on the “contagion effects” in developing financial markets of the Asian region (9 countries). The paper analyzes both long-term and one-day cross-border market reactions. The time horizon of the data sample is from 2000 to 2020. Advantages of the DCC-GARCH-model for adequately accounting for the behavior of financial data are shown. We have found that the impact of ratings and outlooks is stronger in the long term than in the short term. We identified pairs of countries with greatest “contagion effects” as the reaction to sovereign ratings updates. Taiwan is an important reference point for investors in the Asian region. The downgrade of its sovereign rating is a signal for a general deterioration of the investment environment in the region and primarily has a negative effect on the countries with the lowest credit ratings: Indonesia, Philippines and India. Extrapolation of sovereign rating information updates strongly expressed in the “China-Hong Kong” pair in both directions. In addition, we characterized the features of transmission processes with positive and negative effects. We found that in the case of a negative contagion effect, when there is an extrapolation of reactions to a potential or actual deterioration in a country's credit quality outside its borders, investors tend to have stronger reaction towards one of the contagion factors: rating or outlook. When a potential or actual improvement in a country's credit quality is perceived as a signal for an improvement in another country, the strength of the influence of the rating and outlook has a positive relationship: the stronger (weaker) the influence of the rating, the stronger (weaker) the influence of the outlook.

Keywords
Keywords: contagion effect on financial markets, emerging financial markets, sovereign ratings, DCC-GARCH.
Received
25.03.2021
Date of publication
29.03.2021
Number of purchasers
24
Views
1240
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S042473880014080-7-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 02.03.2021
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Arezki R., Candelon B., Sy A. (2011). Sovereign rating news and financial markets spillovers: Evidence from the European debt crisis. IMF Working Papers, International Monetary Fund, 11/68.

2. Bae K.H., Karolyi G., Stulz R. (2003). A new approach to measuring financial contagion. Review of Financial Studies, 16 (3), 717–763.

3. Baum C., Schäfer, D., Stephan A. (2016). Credit rating agency downgrades and the Eurozone sovereign debt crises. Journal of Financial Stability, 24 (7), 117–131.

4. Baig T., Goldfajn I. (1999). Financial market contagion in the Asian crisis. IMF Staff Papers, 46 (2), 3.

5. Bazdresch S., Werner A. (2001). Contagion of International financial crises: The case of Mexico. International Financial Contagion. Claessens E., Forbes K. (eds.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3314-3_12

6. Brooks R., Faff R., Hillier D., Hillier J. (2004). The national market impact of sovereign rating changes. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28 (1), 233–250.

7. Cantor R., Packer F. (1996). Sovereign risk assessment and agency credit ratings. European Financial Management, 2 (2), 247–256.

8. Christopher R., Kim S.J., Wu E. (2012). Do sovereign credit ratings influence regional stock and bond market interdependencies in emerging countries? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 22 (4), 1070–1089. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2012.01.003

9. Dornbusch R., Park Y.C., Claessens S. (2000). Contagion: Understanding how it spreads. World Bank Research Observer, 15 (2), 177–197.

10. Dreher A., Herz B., Karb V. (2006). Is there a causal link between currency and debt crises? International Journal of Finance and Economics, 11 (4), 305–25. DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.300

11. Edwards S. (2000). Interest rates, contagion and capital controls. Working Papers No. 7801, NBER, National Bureau of Economic Research.

12. Engle R. (2000). Dynamic conditional correlation — a simple class of multivariate GARCH Models. University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series. Department of Economics, UC San Diego.

13. Gande A., Parsley D. (2014). Sovereign credit ratings, transparency and international portfolio flows. Working Papers 122014. Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research.

14. Herz B., Tong H. (2003). The interactions between debt and currency crises — common causes or contagion? NBER Working Paper No. 9190. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1002543

15. Ismailescu I., Kazemi H. (2010). The reaction of emerging market credit default swap spreads to sovereign credit rating changes. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34 (12), 2861–2873.

16. Kaminsky G., Schmukler S. (2002). Emerging market instability: Do sovereign ratings affect country risk and stock returns? World Bank Economic Review, 16 (2), 171–195.

17. Longstaff F. (2000). The subprime credit crisis and contagion in financial markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 97 (3), 436–450.

18. Nagayasu J. (2001). Currency crisis and contagion: Evidence from exchange rates and sectoral stock indices in Philippines and Thailand. Journal of Asian Economics, 14, 527–545.

19. Park Y., Song C. (2000). Financial contagion in the East Asian crisis: With special reference to the Republic of Korea. International Financial Contagion. Claessens S., Forbes K. (eds.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2 (2), 88–101.

20. Reisen H., Maltzan P. (1999). Boom and Bust and Sovereign Ratings. International Finance, 2 (2), 273–93.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate