Везде
Nauchno-texnicheskij progress i problemy` pravosudiya
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Nauchno-texnicheskij progress i problemy` pravosudiya
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000525-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
 
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
14-27
Abstract

The article deals with the problematic issues of mutual influence of scientific and technical progress (hereinafter – the STP) on the overall organizational and legal mechanism of justice. It is noted that the very development of the STP causes in life the appearance of qualitatively new types of conflicts, disputes, violations of rights and legitimate interests and offenses, including crimes: committed with the usage of digital technologies; in the sphere of transplantology of human organs and tissues; related to the unlawful use of special scientific and technical means for secret obtaining information and many others, this, in turn, requires an adequate – with the use of the achievements of the STP – development of various parts of the justice mechanism, not only in the field of technology. It is necessary to improve the judiciary component (the deepening of specialization), the judicial component (the improving procedural techniques, including through a certain displacement of the goal-setting trial) and, especially, the judicial and status component of the mechanism. Here it is justified that it is extremely important for a judge hearing, for example, a criminal case, to gain confidence in the proof of the fact of committing a crime precisely by the defendant. In addition to indirect evidence, as well as relative evidence obtained with the use of achievements of the STP (through the use of a polygraph, with the use of medicines, hypnotic influence, etc.), the absolute evidence, also based on the achievements of the STP, is fundamentally important for the judge. In the author’s opinion, these are – in development – active and widely used: method of fingerprinting, the method of DNA analysis, and not yet valid and even not invented method of mentoscopy. The initial postulate of which is the fact that all information received through the receptors of a person’s sense organs is preserved in the «depths» of his memory and a technical (potentially) possibility, with observance of a number of conditions, to reproduce its part in the interests of justice.

Keywords
court, scientific and technical progress, relative and absolute evidence
Date of publication
01.03.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1312
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Antologiya mirovoj pravovoj mysli: v 5 t. / nauch. ruk. G.Yu. Semigin. M., 1999 
 
 2. Kutafin O.E., Lebedev V.M., Semigin G.Yu. Sudebnaya vlast' v Rossii: istoriya, dokumenty: v 6 t. M., 2003 
 
 3. Yakovlev V.F., Semigin G.Yu. Ehkonomicheskoe (kommercheskoe) pravosudie v Rossii: v 4 t. M., 2004-2006 
 
 4. Laptev V.A., Solov'yanenko N.I. Ehlektronnoe pravosudie i ehlektronnyj dokumentooborot kak uslovie modernizatsii regulyatornoj sredy dlya biznesa // Ross. sud'ya. 2017. № 2 
 
 5. Selina E.V. Ehlektronnoe i distantsionnoe pravosudie: vyzovy vremeni i perspektivy // Administrator suda. 2016. № 3 
 
 6. Laptev V.A. Otvetstvennost' "buduschego": pravovoe suschestvo i vopros otsenki dokazatel'stv // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2017. № 3 
 
 7. SharipovA.K. Ehlektronnoe pravosudie v Respublike Kazakhstan kak faktor ukrepleniya doveriya naseleniya k sudebnoj vlasti // Sud'ya. 2017. № 10. S. 23-27 
 
 8. Kleandrov M.I. O Sovete sudebnoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federatsii. M., 2016 
 
 9. Panyushkin V.A. Nauchno-tekhnicheskij progress i problemy razrabotki novogo UPK Rossii: neobkhodimost' i osnovnye trebovaniya k pravovoj reglamentatsii dostizhenij nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa v ugolovnom protsesse // Sudebnaya vlast' i ugolovnyj protsess. 2016. № 1 (2) 
 
 10. Pravovaya nauka i reforma yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya / pod red. Yu.N. Starilova. Vyp. 8. Voronezh, 1998. S. 271-278 
 
 11. Zotov D.V., Panyushkin V.A. Razvitie idej o nauchno-tekhnicheskikh dostizheniyakh v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve v rabotakh uchenykh yuridicheskogo fakul'teta Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta // Sudebnaya vlast' i ugolovnyj protsess. 2016. № 1. S. 40-50 
 
 12. Rozovskij B.G. Problemnye voprosy zakonotvorchestva v obespechenii ehkonomicheskoj bezopasnosti Ukrainy // Ehkonomiko-pravovye issledovaniya v XXI veke: pravovoe obespechenie ehkonomicheskogo suvereniteta Ukrainy v usloviyakh uglubleniya mezhdunarodnoj integratsii: materialy Shestoj mezhdunar. Internet-konf. (g. Donetsk, 21-30 sentyabrya 2010 g.) / nauch. red. V.K. Mamutov. Donetsk, 2010. S. 45 
 
 13. SZ RF. 2016. № 49, st. 6887 
 
 14. Yastrebov O.A. Diskussiya o predposylkakh dlya prisvoeniya robotom pravovogo statusa "ehlektronnykh lits" // Voprosy pravovedeniya. 2017. № 1. S. 189-202 
 
 15. Sm., napr.: Roiz Dzh. Teoriya spravedlivosti / per. s angl.: V. Tselischev, V. Karpovich, A. Shevchenko. Novosibirsk, 1995. 
 
 16. Sm.: Momotov V.V. Ehffektivnost' pravosudiya v kontekste pravovoj kul'tury: sravnitel'no-pravovoj analiz // Sud'ya. 2017. № 10. 
 
 17. Sm.: Kommersant. 2017. 17 iyulya. 
 
 18. Sm.: Izvestiya. 2017. 11 okt. 
 
 19. Sm.: Kommersant. 2017. 23 marta. 
 
 20. Sm.: Ross. gaz. 2012. 13 noyab. 
 
 21. Sm.: Izvestiya. 2016. 27 iyunya. 
 
 22. Ross. gaz. 2017. 10 okt. 
 
 23. Kommersant. 2017. 15 noyab. 
 
 24. Amosov S.M. Sudebnoe poznanie v arbitrazhnom protsesse. M., 2003. 
 
 25. Papkova O.A. Usmotrenie suda. M., 2005 
 
 26. Taru-sina N.N. O sudebnom usmotrenii: zametki semejnoveda. Yaroslavl', 2011 
 
 27. Telyatnikov V.I. Ubezhdenie sud'i. SPb., 2004 
 
 28. Aehron B. Sudejskoe usmotrenie / per. s angl. M., 1999 
 
 29. Ross. gaz. 2012. 27 apr. 
 
 30. Sudejskoe usmotrenie: ponyatie, osnovaniya, predely: materialy VI-j Mezhregion. nauch.-prakt. konf. M., 2015 
 
 31. Postanovlenie IX Vserossijskogo s'ezda sudej ot 8 dekabrya 2016 g. № 1 "Ob osnovnykh itogakh funktsionirovaniya sudebnoj sistemy Rossijskoj Federatsii i prioritetnykh napravleniyakh ee razvitiya na sovremennom ehtape" // Ross. pravosudie. 2017. № 2 (130). S. 9-29 
 
 32. Dolinskaya V.V. Istochniki prava i ofitsial'nye informatsionnye resursy // Zakony Rossii. Opyt. Analiz. Praktika. 2017. № 10 
 
 33. Petukhov N.A., Burdina E.V. Sudebnaya sistema sovremennoj Rossii: analiz soblyudeniya standartov mezhdunarodnogo prava (nezavisimost' sudej, glasnost' pravosudiya i prozrachnost' sudebnoj deyatel'nosti) // Ross. pravosudie. 2017. № 9 (137). S. 49, 50 
 
 34. Fedorov A.V. Sotsial'nyj kontrol' i korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya yuridicheskikh lits // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2017. № 4 (65). S. 13 
 
 35. SZ RF. 2014. № 18 (ch. II), st. 2159. 
 
 36. Sm.: SZ RF. 2016. № 49, st. 6887. 
 
 37. Ross. gaz. 2017. 14 iyulya; Poisk. 2016. 23 dek.; 2017. 17 marta; 14 iyulya, 17 noyab.; Kommersant. 2017. 13 noyab

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate