Epistemic Injustice as Systemic Communicative Dysfunction
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Epistemic Injustice as Systemic Communicative Dysfunction
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000616-7-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
42-47
Abstract
It is argued that epistemic injustice as a problem of expertise is related not only to its scientization, closure, and the inability of institutionalized experts to hear the voice of representatives of the marginal communities, as stated in the article by S.Y. Shevchenko, but also to systemic communicative dysfunction in the relations of scientists, experts, representatives of marginal communities and state authorities. It is supposed that dashing about of dysfunctionality of interactions is the mistrust of social actors to each other which generates mutual forms of both hermeneutical, and testimonial injustice in M. Fricker sense. Unilateral view of marginalized communities is criticized. It should be taken into account that due to the rapid specialization in scientific production of knowledge, the boundary between the expert and the profane is radically shifted from the space of external social relations to the internal mental space of each of the experts.
Keywords
expertise, counter-expertise, communicative dysfunction, epistemic injustice, scientization, dissentization, marginal community
Date of publication
01.06.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
606
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S1811-833X0000616-7-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 31.10.2020
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Nichols, T. Smert' ekspertizy. Kak Internet ubivaet nauchnye znaniya [The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge And Why It Matters].Moscow: Eksmo, 2019, 368 pp. (In Russian).
  2. Williams, L.D.A., Moore S. “Guest Editorial: Conceptualizing Justice and Counter-Expertise”, Science as Culture, 2019, iss. 28(3), pp. 251‒276.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate