Везде
SHOULD CIVIL SOCIETY BE ABANDONED?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
SHOULD CIVIL SOCIETY BE ABANDONED?
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000380-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrey Myasnikov 
ORCID: 0000-0002-8530-9490
Edition
Volume 383 Issue 3
Pages
141-148
Abstract
A critical analysis of the theory of institutional matrices S. G. Kirdina, according to which "civil society" is the ideology of Western civilization, not suitable for Russian society; criticized and attempted to replace the theory of "civil society" on the concept of "citizen participation". Arguments are presented in defense of the institutions of private property and economic freedom as the main factors of accelerated modernization of traditional X-societies, including the Russian one. The risks associated with the purposeful activation of collectivist ideology in Russian society and the restriction of economic freedom are considered.
Keywords
civil society; civil participation; institutional matrices X-Y; Russia; private property; power vertical; economic freedom
Date of publication
01.03.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
454
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Dvadtsat' let reform glazami rossiyan (opyt mnogoletnikh sotsiologicheskikh zamerov): analiticheskij doklad / Pod red. M.K. Gorshkova. M.: IS RAN, 2011.


Eliseeff V., Eliseeff D. Yaponskaya tsivilizatsiya. M.: AST, 2008.


Ignatov V.D. Donoschiki v istorii Rossii i SSSR. M.: Veche, 2014.


Inglkhard R., Vel'tser K. Modernizatsiya, kul'turnye izmeneniya i demokratiya. Posledovatel'nost' chelovecheskogo razvitiya M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2011.


Kirdina S.G. “Grazhdanskoe obschestvo”: ukhod ot ideologemy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 2. C. 63–73.


Kirdina S.G. Institutsional'nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii. Vvedenie v Kh-Y-teoriyu. Izd. 3-e, pererabotannoe, rasshirennoe i illyustrirovannoe. M., SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2014.


Konotopov M.V, Smetanin S.I. Ehkonomicheskaya istoriya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: Dashkov i K°, 2003. Motroshilova N.V. Grazhdanskoe obschestvo: filosofskoe ponyatie i sotsial'naya praktika // Rossijskaya filosofskaya gazeta. Maj 2007. № 5. (7) C. 2.


Myasnikov A.G., Pugachev O.S., Pugacheva N.P. Raspad matritsy traditsionnogo soznaniya v Rossii: prichiny i posledstviya // Vestnik Penzenskogo otdeleniya Rossijskogo filosofskogo obschestva № 3: sbornik nauchnykh trudov / Pod red. A.G. Myasnikova M., Penza, 2013. S. 8–40.


Myasnikov A.G. “Russkij Tsar'” v strukture matritsy russkogo traditsionnogo soznaniya (opyt filosofskoj rekonstruktsii) // CREDO new. Teoreticheskij zhurnal. S-Peterburg: SpGU, 2012. № 3. S. 50–58.


Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N.Yu. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazhenij M.: Azbukovnik, 1999.


Pastukhov V.B. Restavratsiya vmesto reformatsii. Dvadtsat' let, kotorye potryasli Rossiyu. M.: OGI, 2012.


Pivovarov Yu.S. Polnaya gibel' vser'ez. M.: ROCSPEhN, 2004.


Pivovarov Yu.S. Russkaya politika v ee istoricheskom i kul'turnom otnosheniyakh. M.: ROSSPEhN, 2006.


Rossijskoe obschestvo v kontekste novykh realij (tezisy o glavnom) / Pod red. M. K. Gorshkova. M.: IS RAN, 2015.


Roulz Dzh. Teoriya spravedlivosti. M.: LKI, 2010.


Sehndel M. Spravedlivost'. Kak postupat' pravil'no? M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2013.


Suponitskaya I. Ravenstvo i svoboda. Rossiya i SShA: sravnenie sistem. M.: ROSSPEhN, 2010.


Tikhonova N.E. Dinamika tsennostno-normativnykh sistem rossiyan i perspektivy modernizatsionnogo proekta // Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii RAN. M., 2011. № 3. C. 10–27.


Khajek F. Pravo, zakonodatel'stvo i svoboda: Sovremennoe ponimanie liberal'nykh printsipov spravedlivosti i politiki. M.: IRISEhN, 2006.


Hincke N. Kant als Herausforderung an die Gegenwart. Freiburg, Munchen: Alber, 1980.


Höffe O. “Königliche Völker”: Zu Kant kosmopolitische Rechts- u. Friedenstheorie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2001.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate