PRECARIAT - A NEW SOCIAL CLASS
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
PRECARIAT - A NEW SOCIAL CLASS
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000380-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
3-13
Abstract
The article explains the reasons for the emergence of a new social class – the precariat, its structure and main characteristics. It shows the maturation of the idea of the precariat in the depths of scientific thought, in the world and domestic social practice. The main features of this class are identified and compared with other social groups. The article reveals the specifics of the precariat, its place and role in the modern division of labor, its position on the labor market, and the first sprouts of its awareness as a “class for itself”. The consequences of the existence and functioning of the precariat are clarified.
Keywords
society, class, the precariat, the proletariat, the labor market, employment
Date of publication
01.06.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
471
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Bizyukov P. Chto takoe prekariat? // Gazeta.ru. 2014. 1 maya.

Volovskaya N.M., Plyusnina L.K., Rusina A.V., Inozemtseva A.V. Nezanyatoe naselenie i samozanyatost' v sibirskom regione // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 5. S. 52–60.

Golenkova Z.T., Goliusova Yu.V. Novye sotsial'nye gruppy v sovremennykh stratifikatsionnykhsistemakh global'nogo obschestva // Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika. 2013.№ 3. S. 5–8.

Golodets O. 38 millionov trudosposobnykh rossiyan zanyaty neponyatno chem // Rossijskaya gazeta.2013. 3 aprelya.

Gorshkov M.K. Rossijskoe obschestvo kak ono est' (opyt sotsiologicheskoj diagnostiki). M., 2011.

Grinberg R.S. Velikaya transformatsiya: nevyuchennye uroki. M., 2009.

Davydov A.P. Zinaida Golenkova i rossijskaya sotsiologiya // Filosofskie nauki. 2014. № 10.C. 123–136.

Zajtsev L.N., Vikulin Ya.N. V sejfakh bogachej i “narodnoj kazne” // Sovetskaya Rossiya. 2015. 24 yanvarya.

Istomin V. Krizis i bezrabotitsa ugrozhayut strane sotsial'nym vzryvom // Versiya. 2015. № 3.C. 17.

Kozina I.M. Rabotniki zaemnogo truda // Cotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 5. C. 19–31.

Malakhov A. Alotony i avtokhtony: migranty kak sub'ekt sotsial'nogo vzaimodejstviya // Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 1. C. 111–125.

Marmer Eh. Chto takoe prekariat // Neue Zeiten. 2009. № 5.

Mel'nik E. Prekariat vsekh stran, soedinyajsya! // Ezhenedel'nik 2000 – Svoboda slova. 2007.№ 48. 30 noyabrya – 6 dekabrya.

Mekhanik A. Unizhennye i oskorblennye sovremennogo mira // Ehkspert. 2014. № 1. S. 15–27.

Mishina I. Vopros zhizni i smerti // Versiya. 2015. № 3. S. 15–16.

Rossijskij statisticheskij ezhegodnik: 2012. Stat. sb. M., 2012.

Strelkov D.O., Shevchuk A.V. Frilansery na rossijskom rynke truda // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2010. № 2. S. 45–56.

Stehnding G. Prekariat: novyj opasnyj klass. M., 2014.

Toschenko Zh.T. Ehkonomicheskoe soznanie i povedenie: chetvert' veka spustya (konets 1980-kh – nachalo 2010-kh gg.) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 7. C. 51–63.

Shestopal E.B. Chetvert' veka politicheskikh reform v Rossii s tochki zreniya psikhologii // Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 1. C. 136–150.

Yur'eva E. Orden-bonus // Sovetskaya Rossiya. 2015. 24 yanvarya.

Bourdieu P. Le precarite est aujourd’hui partour (Precariousness is Everywhere Novadays) // Contrefeux. Paris. 1998. P. 96–102.

Gorz A. Farewell to the Working Class: An Essay on Post-Industrial Socialism. London, 1982.

Hardt M., Negri A. Empire. Cambridge, MA, 2000.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate