HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE: A CONCEPT OF INTERNET-BASED SYSTEM FOR DATA COLLECTING AND PROCESSING
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE: A CONCEPT OF INTERNET-BASED SYSTEM FOR DATA COLLECTING AND PROCESSING
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
119-123
Abstract
The goals, objectives and algorithm of Internet-based system for collecting and processing of data on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of the population are described. A concept of long, systematic, network-centric measurement of HRQOL for most of the population is offered. System to provide assessment of HRQOL thresholds indicators is suggested that leads to treatment or medical assistance, as well as assessment of the relationship of qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the treatment and its results to changes in HRQOL level of performance; rating calculation for different methods of treatment, health care facilities and specific doctors based on comparative data about their impact on the HRQOL of patients. Structure of relationships and dependencies of parites in diagnostic and treatment process are discussed.
Keywords
health-related quality of life, Internet, questionnaire, algorithm
Date of publication
01.07.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
371
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Gushchin A.V., Petraevskij A.V. Kachestvo zhizni kak ocenochnyj kriterij v medicine (na primere oftal'mologii). Volgograd: Izd-vo VolgGMU, 2013.

Kotler F. Osnovy marketinga. Litres, 2015.

Brown D.S. et al. Using health-related quality of life and quality-adjusted life expectancy for effective public health surveillance and prevention // Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research. 2013. T. 13. №. 4. P. 425.

Dowie J. Decision validity should determine whether a generic or condition‐specific HRQOL measure is used in health care decisions // Health economics. 2002. T. 11. № 1. P. 1–8.

Etkind S.N. et al. Capture, transfer, and feedback of patient-centered outcomes data in palliative care populations: does it make a difference? A systematic review // Journal of pain and symptom management. 2015. T. 49. № 3. P. 611–624.

Jamtvedt G. et al. Audit and Feedback: Effects on Professional Practice and Health Care Outcomes [Cochrane Review] // The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2003.

Huang K.W., Sundararajan A. Pricing digital goods: Discontinuous costs and shared infrastructure // Information Systems Research. 2011. T. 22. № 4. P. 721–738.

Kraђgeloh C.U. et al. Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire for general use in New Zealand: Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis // Quality of Life Research. 2013. T. 22. № 6. P. 1451–1457.

Laurie B., Doctorow C. Computing: Secure the Internet // Nature. 2012. T. 491. № 7424. P. 325–326.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate