SOCIOLOGY OF MORALITY AND EVOLUTIONARY THEORY: HISTORY AND PERSPECTIVES
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
SOCIOLOGY OF MORALITY AND EVOLUTIONARY THEORY: HISTORY AND PERSPECTIVES
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
127-136
Abstract

In this article, I analyze relationships between sociology of morality and evolutionary theory from both historical and theoretical points of view. First, I compare classical evolutionary conceptions of morality by C. Darwin and H. Spencer, emphasizing that evolutionary perspective in the sociology of morality is not something absolutely new but, rather, it once belonged to the core ideas of the discipline. After that, I review the key new-Darwinian models of explanations of moral behavior which are related to a number of different approaches, such as theories of kin and group selection, reciprocal altruism and cooperation, evolutionary psychology and theory of cultural evolution. I argue that modern evolutionary disciplines reached considerable success in studying moral phenomena, so that sociology of morality needs to incorporate these theoretical models in order to provide a fuller understanding of morality. In this context, I review J. Turner’s conception of “evolutionary sociology” as an attempt of sociological reception of the modern evolutionary synthesis in behavioral sciences. While Turner is given credit for drawing sociologists’ attention to modern evolutionary conceptions of morality, I also criticize his approach for over-emphasizing the historical perspective of the hominid evolution and lack of elaboration of this conceptions to the studies of morality in modern societies; at the same time I argue that classical sociology of morality still has large theoretical resources which can be integrated with modern evolutionary perspective, so that moral phenomena would receive a more rigorous scientific explanation.

Keywords
altruism, morality, moral norms, sociology of morality, evolutionary theory
Date of publication
01.01.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
448
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Batygin G.S. Kak nevozmozhna sotsiologiya morali // Opravdanie morali: Sb. nauchnykh statej: K 70-letiyu professora Yu.V. Sogomonova / Otv. red. V.I. Bakshtanovskij, A.Yu. Sogomonov. M., Tyumen', 2000. S. 108–119.

Sokolov V.M. Sotsiologiya morali – real'naya ili gipoteticheskaya? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2004. № 8. S. 78–88.

Darvin Ch. Proiskhozhdenie cheloveka i polovoj otbor // Darvin Charl'z. Sochineniya. Tom 5. M.: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1953.

Devyatko I.F. V storonu spravedlivosti: ehksperimental'noe issledovanie vzaimosvyazi mezhdu deskriptivnym obydennym znaniem i vospriyatiem distributivnoj spravedlivosti // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 2011. № 2 (55). S. 139–164.

Devyatko I.F. Stadii ehvolyutsii i problema klassifikatsii istoricheskikh tipov obschestva // Rossiya reformiruyuschayasya. Ezhegodnik / Otv. red. M.K. Gorshkov. Vyp. 7. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 2008. S. 23–39.

Dyurkgejm Eh. O razdelenii obschestvennogo truda / Per. s fr. A.B. Gofmana. M.: Kanon, 1996.

Kollinz R. Sotsiologiya: nauka ili antinauka? // THESIS. 1994. № 4. S. 71–96.

Romanovskij N.V. O “tochkakh rosta” sovremennoj teoreticheskoj sotsiologii // Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie. 2015. № 40. S. 89–110.

Romanovskij N.V. Esche raz o roli teoreticheskoj sotsiologii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 7. S. 93–101.

Spenser G. Nauchnye osnovaniya nravstvennosti. Dannye nauki o nravstvennosti. M.: Izdatel'stvo LKI, 2008.

Uilson Eh.O. O prirode cheloveka. M.: Kuchkovo pole, 2015.

Alland A. Why Not Spencer? // Journal of Anthropological Research. 1974. No. 30 (4): 271–280.

Alexander R.D. A Biological Interpretation of Moral Systems // Zygon. 1985. No. 20: 3–20.

Axelrod R. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, 1984.

Boyd R., Richerson P.J., Henrich J. Rapid Cultural Adaptation Can Facilitate the Evolution of Large-scale Cooperation // Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2011. No. 65: 431–444.

Boyd R., Richerson P. Culture and The Evolution of Human Cooperation // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2009. No. 364: 3281–3288.

Brewer M.B. In-Group Bias in the Minimal Intergroup Situation: A Cognitive-Motivational Analysis // Psychological Bulletin. 1979. No. 86 (2): 307–324.

Franks D. Neurosociology. The Nexus Between Neuroscience and Social Psychology. New York: Springer, 2010.

Freeman D. The Evolutionary Theories of Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer // Current Anthropology. 1974. No. 15 (3): 211–237.

Graham J., Haidt J., Nosek B. Liberals and Conservatives Use Different Sets of Moral Foundations // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009. No. 96: 1029–1046.

Greene J. Moral Tribes. Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them. New York: The Penguin Press, 2013.

Haidt J. Morality // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2008. No. 3: 65–72.

Haines V.A. Spencer, Darwin, and the Question of Reciprocal Influence // Journal of the History of Biology. 1991. No. 24 (3): 409–431.

Hamilton W.D. The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior // The American Naturalist. 1963. No. 97 (896): 354–356.

Hamilton W.D. The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior // Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1964. No. 7 (1): 1–16.

Hitlin S., Vaisey S. The New Sociology of Morality // Annual Review of Sociology. 2013. No. 3: 51–68.

Hitlin S., Vaisey S. Back to The Future. Reviving The Sociology of Morality // Handbook of The Sociology of Morality / Ed. by S. Hitlin, S. Vaisey. New York: Springer, 2010. P. 3–14.

Hopcroft R.L. The Evolved Actor in Sociology // Sociological Theory. 2009a. No. 27 (4): 390–406.

Hopcroft R.L. Gender Inequality in Interaction – An Evolutionary Account // Social Forces. 2009b. No. 87 (4): 1845–1871.

Huxley J. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen & Unwin, 1942.

Krebs D.L. Morality: An Evolutionary Account // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2008. No. 3: 149–172.

Kurzban R., DeScioli P., Fein D., Hamilton Vs. Kant: Pitting Adaptations for Altruism Against Adaptations for Moral Judgment // Evolution and Human Behavior. 2012. No. 33: 323–333.

Laland K.N., Uller T., Feldman M.W., Sterenly K., Müller G.B., Moczek A., Jablonka E., Odling-Smee J. The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions, And Predictions // Proc. R. Soc. B. 2015. 282 (1813). URL: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/282/1813/20151019 (data obrascheniya: 01.03.2016).

Maryanski A., Turner J.H. The Social Cage: Human Nature and the Evolution of Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.

Maynard Smith J. Group Selection // Quarterly Review of Biology. 1976. No. 51 (2): 277–283.

Noble D. Evolution Beyond Neo-Darwinism: A New Conceptual Framework // Journal of Experimental Biology. 2015. No. 218: 7–13.

Offer J. Herbert Spencer and Social Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Parsons T. The Social System. London: Routledge, 1991.

Parsons T. The Structure of Social Action. London, 1966.

Sear R., Lawson D.W., Dickins T.E. Synthesis in the Human Evolutionary Behavioural Sciences // Journal of Evolutionary Psychology. 2007. No. 5: 3–28.

Trivers R.L. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism // Quarterly Review of Biology. 1971. No. 46: 35–57.

Turner J.H., Machalek R., Maryanski A. (eds) Handbook on Evolution and Society. Toward an Evolutionary Social Science. London: Paradigm Publishers, 2015.

Turner J.H. The Evolution of Affect, Sociality, Altruism and Conscience in Humans // The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity. Formulating a Field of Study / Ed. V. Jeffries. New York, 2014. P. 275–301.

Turner J.H. Natural Selection and The Evolution of Morality in Human Societies // Handbook of The Sociology of Morality / Ed. S. Hitlin, S. Vaisey. New York: Springer, 2010. P. 125–146.

Turner J.H. The Forgotten Theoretical Giant: Herbert Spencer’s Models and Principles // Revue Europeenne Des Sciences Sociales. 1981. No. 19: 79–98.

Turner S. Social Theory As a Cognitive Neuroscience // European Journal of Social Theory. 2007. No. 10 (3): 357–374.

Rai T.S., Fiske A.P. Moral Psychology Is Relationship Regulation: Moral Motives for Unity, Hierarchy, Equality, and Proportionality // Psychological Review. 2011. No. 118 (1): 57–75.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate