Везде
METHODOLOGICAL INSTITUTIONALISM AND MESO-LEVEL OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
METHODOLOGICAL INSTITUTIONALISM AND MESO-LEVEL OF SOCIAL ANALYSIS
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Svetlana G. Kirdina-Chandler 
ORCID: 0000-0002-9234-8308
Edition
Volume 380 Issue 12
Pages
51-59
Abstract
A modified view of the allocation of macro -, meso - and micro-levels of social analysis is proposed, due to the development of the institutional approach in sociology and Economics. It is shown that in a number of studies, the meso-level is understood as a space for the formation of rules and as these rules themselves, on the basis of which microsubjects of various kinds interact. As a result, they generate macrostructures that have their own properties that are not reducible to the properties of their constituent elements. The new understanding of the meso-level provokes to Supplement the set of known prerequisites of social analysis (methodological individualism and holism) with the principle of methodological institutionalism. Its content, as well as areas of application, are discussed in the article.
Keywords
methodology, institutionalism, methodological institutionalism, meso-level of social analysis, methodological individualism, holism
Date of publication
01.12.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
425
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Archer M. Realizm i morfogenez. V: Teoriya obschestva: fundamental'nye problemy / Pod red. A.F. Filippova. M.: KANON-PRESS-Ts – Kuchkovo pole, 1999.


Balatskij E.V. Za predelami “ehkonomicheskogo imperializma”: preodolenie slozhnosti // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2012. № 4. S. 138–149.


Blaug M. Ehkonomicheskaya mysl' v retrospektive. M.: Delo LTD, 1994.


Boltanski L., Teveno L. Sotsiologiya kriticheskoj sposobnosti // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 2000. T. 3. № 3. S. 66–83.


Boltanski L., Teveno L. Kritika i obosnovanie spravedlivosti: Ocherki sotsiologii gradov / Per. s fr. O.V. Kovenevoj; nauch. red. perevoda N.E. Koposov. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013.


Bol'shoj tolkovyj sotsiologicheskij slovar' (Collins). T. 1. M.: VEChE-AST, 1999.


Gareev T.R. Instituty i ehkonomicheskoe razvitie na subregional'nom (mezo-) urovne // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2010. № 5. C. 45–58.


Dozi Dzh. Ehkonomicheskaya koordinatsiya i dinamika: nekotorye osobennosti al'ternativnoj ehvolyutsionnoj paradigmy // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2012. № 12. S. 31–55.


Dopfer K. Istoki mezoehkonomiki // Ehvolyutsionnaya teoriya, teoriya samovosproizvodstva i ehkonomicheskoe razvitie. Mater. 7-go mezhdunar. simpoziuma po ehvolyutsionnoj ehkonomike, 14–15 sentyabrya 2007, g. Puschino, Mosk. obl. M.: Institut ehkonomiki RAN, 2008.


Dyurkgejm Eh. Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie. M.: Kanon, 1995.


Zaslavskaya T.I. O sotsial'nom mekhanizme razvitiya ehkonomiki // Puti sovershenstvovaniya sotsial'nogo mekhanizma razvitiya sovetskoj ehkonomiki. Novosibirsk: IEhiOPP SO AN SSSR, 1985.


Kirdina S.G. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya v ehkonomike i sotsiologii: problemy metodologii // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2014. № 5. S. 60–75.


Kirdina S.G. Metodologicheskij individualizm i metodologicheskij institutsionalizm // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2013. № 10. S. 66–89.


Klejner G.B. Mezoehkonomicheskie problemy rossijskoj ehkonomiki // Ehkonomicheskij vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2003. T. 1. № 2. S. 11–18.


Maracha V.G. Struktura i razvitie nauki s tochki zreniya metodologicheskogo institutsionalizma // Metodologiya nauki: problemy i istoriya. M.: IF RAN, 2003.


Medvedev V.A. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie tendentsii razvitiya sotsial'no-gumanitarnogo poznaniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 9. S. 3–12.


Orekhovskij P.A. Struktura polya ehkonomicheskogo znaniya: vozmozhnosti i predely ehkonomicheskikh diskussij // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2015. № 1. S. 5–23.


Podvojskij D.G. Yazyki sotsiologii: mnogoslovie ili kakofoniya? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 5. S. 3–9.


Polterovich V.M. Stanovlenie obschego sotsial'nogo analiza // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2011. № 2. S. 101–111.


Radaev V.V. Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. M.: GU-VShEh, 2005.


Radaev V.V. Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya sovremennoj ehkonomicheskoj sotsiologii // Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya: novye podkhody k institutsional'nomu i setevomu analizu / Sost. i nauch. red. V.V. Radaev. M.: ROSSPEhN, 2002. C. 3–18.


Romanovskij N.V. Iokogama: itogi i uroki // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 7. S. 15–24.


Rubinshtejn A.Ya. Ehkonomika obschestvennykh preferentsij. Struktura i ehvolyutsiya sotsial'nogo interesa. SPb.: Aletejya, 2008.


Tambovtsev V.L. Perspektivy “ehkonomicheskogo imperializma” // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2008. № 5. S. 129–136.


Terborn G. Prinadlezhnost' k kul'ture, mestopolozhenie v strukture i chelovecheskoe dejstvie: ob'yasnenie v sotsiologii i sotsial'noj nauke // Teoriya obschestva: fundamental'nye problemy / Pod red. A.F. Filippova. M.: KANON-PRESS-Ts – Kuchkovo pole, 1999.


Toschenko Zh.T. Ehvolyutsiya teoreticheskoj sotsiologii v Rossii (1950–2000-e gody). Stat'ya 2 // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 7. S. 3–16.


Toschenko Zh.T. Novye tendentsii v razvitii rossijskoj sotsiologii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 4. S. 3–12.


Fligstin N. Polya, vlast' i sotsial'nye navyki: kriticheskij analiz novykh institutsional'nykh techenij // Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. 2001. T. 2. № 4. S. 28–55.


Frolov D.P. Institutsionalizm v metakonkurentsii ehkonomicheskikh teorij // Mater. nauch. sessii. Vyp. 1: Ehkonomika i finansy. Volgograd: Izd-vo VolGU, 2002.


Frolov D.P. Metodologicheskij institutsionalizm: novyj vzglyad na ehvolyutsiyu ehkonomicheskoj nauki // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2008. № 11. S. 90–101.


Khoking S., Mlodinov L. Kratchajshaya istoriya vremeni / Per. s angl. SPb.: Amfora, 2007.


Blau P. Exchange and Power in Social Life. N.Y.: Wiley, 1964.


Buckley W. Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. N.Y.: Prentice Hall, 1967.


DiMaggio P., Powell W. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields // American Sociological Review. 1983. Vol. 48. № 2. R. 147–160.


Dopfer K., Foster J., Potts J. Micro-Meso-Macro // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2004. Vol. 14. Issue 3. P. 263–279.


Elsner W. Why Meso? On “Aggregation” and “Emergence”, and Why and How the Meso Level is Essential in Social Economics // Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals. 2007. Vol. 36. № 1. April. P. 1–16.


Elsner W. The Process and a Simple Logic of “Meso”. On the Co-Evolution of Institutional Emergence and Group Size // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2010. Vol. 20. № 3. P. 445–477.


Fligstein N. Social Skill and the Theory of Fields // Sociological Theory. 2001. Vol.19. № 2. P. 105–121.


Gruchy A. Modern Economic Thought. The American Contribution. New York: Prentice Hall, 1947.


Hamilton D. Why is Institutional Economics Not Institutional? // The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 1962. Vol. 21. № 3. July. P. 309–317.


Hayden G. Policymaking for a Good Society: The Social Fabric Matrix Approach to Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation. N.Y.: Springer, 2006.


Heilbroner R. Understanding Macroeconomics. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, 1970.


Homo institutius – Chelovek institutsional'nyj: kollektivnaya monografiya / Pod red. O.V. Inshakova. Volgograd: Izd-vo VolGU, 2005.


Jepperson R.L. Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism // Powell W.W., DiMaggio P.J. (eds). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. P. 143–163.


Keizer P. The Concept of Institution in Economics and Sociology, a Methodological Exposition. Working Papers. 07-25. Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute – Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, 2007.


North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.


Parsons T. The Structure of Social Action. N.Y: McGraw Hill, 1937.


Popper K. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957.


Scott W.R. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2008.


Therborn G. Cultural Belonging, Structural Location, and Human Action. Explanation in Sociology and in Social Science // Acta Sociologica: Journal of the Scandinavian Sociological Association. 1991. Vol. 34. № 3. P. 177–192.


Udehn L. Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. London: Routledge, 2001.


Watkins J.M. Ideal Types and Historical Explanation // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 1952. № 3. May. P. 22–34.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate