AT THE INTERSECTION OF NATURAL SCIENCE AND SOCIOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE: THE EXPERIENCE OF STUDYING ONE PROBLEM
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
AT THE INTERSECTION OF NATURAL SCIENCE AND SOCIOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE: THE EXPERIENCE OF STUDYING ONE PROBLEM
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
14-21
Abstract
The article proves the necessity of interrelation of sociological and natural science knowledge in the analysis of specific problems. The convergence of these types of knowledge is justified by the logic of the historical development of sociology, which went from positivism to postpositivism. The role of postmodernism in the development of natural science approaches and interpretation of complex nonlinear social processes is emphasized. The experience of studying on the basis of interdisciplinary methodology of the problem of non-linearity of social processes and the resulting non-linearity of social time. The characteristics, properties and qualities of nonlinear time are revealed: multistructure, alternativeness, uniqueness of temporal processes and phenomena, their probability, non-obviousness, flexibility, instantaneity, etc. Special attention is paid to the use of the achievements of neurophysiology, biology, astrophysics, mathematics, endophysics and the synergetic approach in the analysis of sociological problems.
Keywords
natural science knowledge, sociological knowledge, integration of scientific knowledge, non-linearity of social processes, non-linearity of social time
Date of publication
01.09.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
561
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Abul'khanova-Slavskaya L.K. Strategiya zhizni. M.: Mysl', 1991.

Alyushin A.L., Knyazeva E.N. Tempomiry: Skorost' vospriyatiya i shkaly vremeni. M.: URSS,2012.

Ambarova P.A., Zborovskij G.E. Temporal'nye strategii povedeniya sotsial'nykh obschnostej kaksotsiologicheskaya problema // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 5. S. 61–71.

Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost'. M.: Piter, 2008.

Gerder I. Idei k filosofii istorii chelovechestva. M.: Nauka, 1977.

Grebenyuk E.N. Sinergeticheskij podkhod v gumanitarnom issledovanii. Astrakhan': Izd. dom “Astrakhanskij gosudarstvennyj universitet”, 2011.Delez Zh. Logika smysla. M.: Raritet; Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 1998.

Dobritsyna I.A. Ot postmodernizma – k nelinejnoj arkhitekture: Arkhitektura v kontekste sovremennoj filosofii i nauki. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2004.

Kazanskij B.A. Formalizatsiya so-bytijnosti: butstrap-sistemy v biologii, biosferologii, kibernetike i fizike // Ehkogeosofskij al'manakh “Mudrost' doma Zemlya”: O mirovozzreniiKhKhI veka. Donetsk, 2007. URL: http://www.evol.nw.ru/labs/lab38/kazansky/kazansky_al6_site.doc(data obrascheniya: 25.10.2013).

Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Intuitsiya kak samodostraivanie // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. № 2.S. 110–122.

Kravchenko S.A. Vliyanie nelinejnoj sotsiokul'turnoj dinamiki na riski: vyzovy sotsiologicheskomu znaniyu // Kommunikologiya. 2013. Tom 1. № 1. S. 59–72.

Kravchenko S.A. Nelinejnaya dinamika: paradoksal'nye razryvy i sintezy sotsiuma // VestnikMGIMO Universiteta. 2008. № 2. S. 66–76.

Kravchenko S.A. Stanovlenie slozhnogo sotsiuma // Gumanitarij Yuga Rossii. 2012. № 2. S. 29–45.

Kurkina E.S. Konets rezhimov s obostreniem. Kollaps tsivilizatsii. URL: http://spkurdyumov.narod.ru/kurkinaes.htm (data obrascheniya: 05.10.2013).

Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya: biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya / Per.s angl. Yu.A. Danilova. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001.

Mozhejko M.A. Yazyk i tvorchestvo. Postmodernizm v lingvistike // Izvestiya Smolenskogo gosuniversiteta. 2008. № 1. S. 58–67.

Nazaretyan A.P. Nelinejnoe buduschee. Megaistoricheskie, sinergeticheskie i kul'turno-psikhologicheskie predposylki global'nogo prognozirovaniya. M.: Izd-vo MBA, 2013.

Prigozhin I. Ot suschestvuyuschego k voznikayuschemu. Vremya i slozhnost' v fizicheskikh naukakh.M.: KomKniga, 2006.

Sorokin P.A. Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika. M.: Astrel', 2006.

Sotsiologicheskie razmyshleniya: Interv'yu s prof. N. Lumanom // Problemy teoreticheskoj sotsiologii. SPb.: TOO TK “Petropolis”, 1994. S. 237–238.

Toschenko Zh.T. Novye tendentsii v razvitii rossijskoj sotsiologii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 4. S. 3–13.

Tom R. Strukturnaya ustojchivost' i morfogenez. M.: Logos, 2002.

Urri Dzh. Sotsiologiya za predelami obschestv: vidy mobil'nosti dlya XXI stoletiya. M., 2012a.

Urri Dzh. Mobil'nosti. M., 2012b.

Fejgenbaum M. Universal'nost' v povedenii nelinejnykh sistem // Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk.1983. T. 141. Vyp. 2. S. 343–374.

Khaken G. Sinergetika. M.: Mir, 1980.

Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoj istorii. M.: Mysl', 1993.

Bauman Z. Liquid Modernity. Polity, 2000.

Bohm D. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge&Kegan Paul, London, Boston, 1980.

Chew G.F. “Bootstrap”: a scientific idea? // Science. 1968. Vol. 161. № 3843. P. 762–763.

Lorenz E.N. Designing Chaotic Models // Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 2005. Vol. 62. № 5.P. 1574–1587.

Urry J. Climate Change and Society. Cambridge, 2011.

Urry J. Sociology beyond Societies. Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London and New York:Routledge, 2000.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate