Везде
MATERNAL CAREER: CHILDREN AND WORK STRATEGIES
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MATERNAL CAREER: CHILDREN AND WORK STRATEGIES
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga Isupova 
Edition
Volume 378 Issue 10
Pages
185-194
Abstract
We consider 1 features of mothers ' behavior in the Russian labor market in the 1990s, as well as in the era of relative “capitalist stability” in the 2000s. the Data allow us to make some retrospective estimates of women's combination of work and motherhood in the previous decades, starting from the 1940s. The main provisions of the article are that in the 1990s and 2000s, motherhood was carried out in conditions of gradually weakening institutional support and increasing the role of personal responsibility. Informal kinship and social networks were becoming increasingly popular. however, their strengthening, corresponding to the degree of weakening of institutions, did not occur. The orientation of women mothers to participate in the labor market was consistently high, regardless of their ideas about the “main role” of women in the family and society. The adaptation of mothers to changing conditions was forced to be flexible and required intensive labor efforts (a combination of domestic and paid work).
Keywords
motherhood, children, work, strategies, career
Date of publication
01.10.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
403
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Arzhenovskij S., Artamonova D. Otsenka poter' v zarplate zhenschin s det'mi // Prikladnaya ehkonometrika. 2007. 3 (7). S. 66–79.


Zhitnikova E.A. Gendernaya diskriminatsiya i osobennosti eyo proyavleniya v Rossii // Nauchnye zapiski. Orel GIEhT. 2. 2010. URL: http://www.orelgiet.ru/monah/75jk.pdf (data obrascheniya 29.04.14).


Zelenskaya L.M. Problemy gendernogo ravenstva v oplate truda na rossijskom rynke truda// Upravlenets. 2010. 5–6 (9–10): 72–73.


Zdravomyslova E. Krizis roli babushki. URL: http://www.chaskor.ru/article/krizis_roli_babushki_36911 (data obrascheniya: 13.11.2014).


Karabchuk T.S., Nagernyak M. Determinanty zanyatosti dlya materej v Rossii // Zhurnal issledovanij sotsial'noj politiki. 2013. T. 11. № 1. S. 25–48.


Karabchuk T.S., Pankratova V.L. Oplata truda materej v Rossii: suschestvuet li diskriminatsiya?// Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. T. 14. № 1. Yanvar' 2013. S. 96–110.


Kravchenko L.A. Gendernaya diskriminatsiya v sfere zanyatosti// Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena. 2008. 69. S. 139–142.


Mezentseva E.B. Kadrovaya politika predpriyatij i perspektivy zhenskoj zanyatosti. // Rabotayuschie zhenschiny v usloviyakh perekhoda Rossii k rynku / Otv. red. Rzhanitsyna L. S. M: Institut ehkonomiki RAN, 1993. S. 95–113.


Novikova T.A. Zhenschina i rynok truda // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ehkonomika. № 1. 2003. S. 146–154.


Oschepkov A.Yu. Gendernye razlichiya v oplate truda // Zarabotnaya plata v Rossii: ehvolyutsiya i differentsiatsiya / Otv. red. Gimpel'son V., Kapelyushnikov R. M.: Izd. dom. VShEh, 2008. S. 250–294.


Pobezhko O.N. Gendernaya i vozrastnaya diskriminatsiya v trudovykh otnosheniyakh// Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2009. 1 (3). S. 170–171.


Savinskaya O. B. Zabota o detyakh rabotayuschikh moskvichek // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. №1. S. 137–142.


Stuken T.Yu. Diskriminatsiya v zarabotnoj plate na rossijskom rynke truda // Izvestiya Irkutskoj gosudarstvennoj ehkonomicheskoj akademii. 2007. № 6. S. 127–130.


Anderson D., Binder M., Krause K. The Motherhood Wage Penalty Revisited: Experience, Heterogeneity, Work Effort and Work-Schedule Flexibility // Industrial and Labour Relations Review. 2003. 56 (2). S. 273–294.


Becker G. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.


Biddle J., Zarkin G. Worker Preference and Market Compensation for Job Risk // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1988. 70 (4). R. 660–667.


Budig M., England P. The Wage Penalty for Motherhood // American Sociological Review. 2001. 66. R. 204–225.


Burgess, Noël. “The Motherhood Penalty: How Gender and Parental Status Influence Judgments of JobRelated Competence and Organizational Commitment.” 2013. URL: http://www.uri.edu/research/lrc/research/papers/Burgess_Motherhood_Penalty.pdf (data obrascheniya: 18.12.14).


Cain G. The Economic Analysis of Labour Market Discrimination: A Survey // Handbook of Labour Economics. Amsterdam, North-Holland: Elsevier, 1986.P. 693–781.


Crosby F. J., Williams J. C., Biernat M. 2004. “The maternal wall”// Journal of Social Issues. 2004. 60. P. 675–682.


Davies R., Pierre G. The Family Gap in Pay in Europe: A Cross-Country Study // Labour Economics. 2005. 12 (4). R. 469–486.


Joshi H., Newell M. Pay Differentials and Parenthood: Analysis of Men and Women Born in 1946.


Coventry, UK: University of Warwick for Employment Research, 1989.


Neumark D., Korenman S. Sources of Bias in Women’s Wage Equations: Results Using Sibling Data// Journal of Human Resources. 1994. 29 (2). R. 379–405.


Ogloblin C.Gender Earnings Differential in Russia// Industrial and Labor Relations review. 1999. 52 (4). R. 602–627.


Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Shelley J. Correll. 2004. “Motherhood as a Status Characteristic”// Journal Of Social Issues. 2004. 60. №. 4. R. 683–700.


Waldfogel J. The Effect of Children on Women’s Wages // American Sociological Review. 1997. 62 (2). R. 209–217.


Waldfogel J. The Family Gap for Young Women in the United States and Britain: Can Maternity Leave Make a Difference? // Journal of Labor Economics. 1998a. 16. R. 505–545.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate