Везде
TRADITIONS OF "CRITICAL THEORY" IN MODERN WESTERN SOCIOLOGY OF LAW
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
TRADITIONS OF "CRITICAL THEORY" IN MODERN WESTERN SOCIOLOGY OF LAW
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000616-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Elena V. Maslovskaya 
Edition
Volume 303 Sotsialogicheski issledovania. Issue 7
Pages
39-47
Abstract
The main theoretical approaches developed within the framework of critical theory are considered as directions of Western sociology of law; the features of the socio-legal concepts of Y. Habermas, M. Foucault, P. Bourdieu are noted; it is emphasized that the tradition of critical sociology of law was developed in the "concept of the legal field" of P. Bourdieu; the influence of an interdisciplinary approach to the analysis of legal institutions on modern sociology of law is characterized.
Keywords
sociology of law, sociological jurisprudence, evolution of forms of law, legal institutions, "critical theory", "legal field", legitimacy of legal norms, social integration
Date of publication
05.07.2009
Number of purchasers
0
Views
594
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Fure V. N. Kontury sovremennoj kriticheskoj teorii. Minsk, 2002.
 2. Wacquant L. Pierre Bourdieu // R. Stones (ed). Key sociological thinkers. L., 1998.
 3. Anleu S. Law and social change. L., 2000.
 4. Simon J. Between power and knowledge: Habermas, Foucault and the future of legal studies // R. Cotterrell (ed). Sociological perspectives on law. Aldershot, 2001. Vol. 1.
 5. Habermas J. Postscript to Between Facts and Norms // M. Deflem (ed). Habermas, modernity and law. L., 1996.
 6. Khabermas Yu. Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoj teorii. SPb., 2001.
 7. Khabermas Yu. Demokratiya, razum, nravstvennost'. M., 1995; Denezhkin A. "Faktichnost' i znachimost'" Yu. Khabermasa: novye issledovaniya po teorii prava i demokraticheskogo pravovogo gosudarstva // Khabermas Yu. Demokratiya, razum, nravstvennost'. M., 1995.
 8. Fure V. N. Filosofiya nezavershennogo moderna Yu. Khabermasa. Minsk, 2000.
 9. Rasmussen D. How is valid law possible? // M. Deflem (ed). Habermas, modernity and law. L., 1996. 
 10. Flivberg B. Khabermas i Fuko - teoretiki grazhdanskogo obschestva // Sotsiol. issled. 2000. N 2.
 11. Fuko M. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat': rozhdenie tyur'my. M., 1999.
 12. Hunt A., Wickham G. Foucault and law: Towards a sociology of law as governance. L., 1994.
 13. Bourdieu P. The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field // The Hastings Law Journal. 1987. Vol. 38. N 4.
 14. Burd'e P. Dukh gosudarstva: genezis i struktura byurokraticheskogo polya // Poehtika i politika (sbornik statej). SPb., 1999.
 15. Burd'e P. Vlast' prava: osnovy sotsiologii yuridicheskogo polya // Burd'e P. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo: polya i praktiki. SPb., 2005.
 16. Cotterrell R. The sociology of law: An introduction. 2 edition. L., 1992.
 17. Noreau P., Arnaud A.-J. The sociology of law in France: Trends and paradigms // Journal of Law and Society. 1998. Vol. 25. N 2.
 18. Maslovskaya E. V., Maslovskij M. V. Sotsiologicheskie teorii prava // Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal. 2005. N 1.
 19. Maslovskaya E. V. Transformatsii yuridicheskogo polya v SSSR i postsovetskoj Rossii // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obschestvo. 2007. T. 9. Vyp. 2 (36).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate