Везде
A DIFFERENT SOCIOLOGY IS POSSIBLE: DEPENDING ON THE CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT "ANOTHER"
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
A DIFFERENT SOCIOLOGY IS POSSIBLE: DEPENDING ON THE CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT "ANOTHER"
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000616-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Devora Kalekin-Fishman 
Edition
Volume 303 Sotsialogicheski issledovania. Issue 7
Pages
16-25
Abstract
Claims that the institutions and theories of sociology developed in the United States can reflect the peculiarities of collective life on the globe are now being refuted on several grounds. Sociologists in Australia, Africa, and Latin America insist that collective existence is defined by much more diverse principles than those that correspond to the Western Canon. Another reason is gender. According to feminist sociologists, the basic principle of relationships was developed by white men in the Middle ages. My conclusion: the interweaving of trends in modern sociologization leads to the emergence of a "different" sociology - one that has the potential to comprehensively understand the social and unite sociologists in a global community.
Keywords
"other sociology", postcolonial sociology, feminist sociology, cultural studies, Imperial sociology
Date of publication
05.07.2009
Number of purchasers
0
Views
578
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Hardt M., Negri F. Empire. Cambridge, MASS: Harvard Un-ty Press, 2000.
 2. Postcolonialism Today: Theoretical Challenges and Pragmatic Issues - A Multidisciplinary Conference. Toronto, September 26 - 28, 2002.
 3. Connell R. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity. 1995.
 4. Williams R. The Long Revolution. Harmondsworth (Middx.): Penguin. 1971.
 5. Thompson E. P. The Making of the English Working Class. London: V. Gollancz. 1964. 
 6. Levi-Sfrauss C. La Pensee Sauvage. Paris: Plon. 1962.
 7. AlthusserL. For Marx. New York: Pantheon Books. 1969.
 8. Barthes R. S/Z. Paris: Editions de Seuil. 1970.
 9. Hall S. Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms //Media, Culture & Society. 1980. V. 2, no. 1: 57 - 73.
 10. Mercer K. Welcome to the Jungle: New Positions in Black Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge. 1994.
 11. Probyn E. Sexing the Self: Gendered Positions in Cultural Studies. London: Taylor & Francis Group. (2004 / 1993).
 12. Sasson-Levy O. Constructing Identities at the Margins: Masculinities and Citizenship in the Israeli Army // The Sociological Quarterly, 2002, V. 43 (3), pp. 357 - 83.
 13. Hemmings C. Cultural Theory and the Ontological Turn // Cultural Studies. 2005. V. 19, no. 5, p. 548 - 67.
 14. Ritzer G. (ed.) Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 2000.
 15. Walby S. ([with Wendy Olsen). Modelling Gender Pay Gaps Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission. 2004.
 16. Walby S. Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell. 1990.
 17. Walhy S., Gottfried H., Gottschall K., Osawu M. (eds). Gendering the Knowledge Economy: Comparative Perspectives. London: Palgrave, 2007. 
 18. Harding S. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Un-ty Press. 1986; Harding S. Is there a Feminist Method? // Philosophical Foundations of Social Research Methods. 2006.
 19. Lather P. Feminist and Poststructural Perspectives: Science After Truth // K. de Marrais, S. D. Lapan (eds). Foundations for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004, pp. 203 - 16.
 20. Madriz E. Focus Groups in Feminist Research // N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (eds). Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. Thousand Oaks / London / New Delhi: Sage, 2003, pp. 363 - 88.
 21. Reinharz S. Feminist Methods in Social Research. USA: Oxford Un-ty Press. 1992.
 22. Reinharz S., Chase S. E. Interviewing Women // J. A. Holstein, J. E. Gubrium (eds). Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage, 2003, pp. 73 - 90.
 23. Landman M. Getting Quality in Qualitative Research: A Short Introduction to Feminist Methodology and Methods. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2007.
 24. Denis A. Intersectional Analysis - A Contribution of Feminism to Sociology // International Sociology Review of Books. 2008. V. 23, no. 5.
 25. McCall L. The Complexity of Intersectionality // Signs, 2005. V. 30, no. 3: 1771 - 99.
 26. Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic Cultures: How Scientists Make Sense. Chicago: Chicago Un-ty Press. 1993.
 27. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Un-ty Press. 1986/1979.
 28. Actor-Network Theory // ISCID Encyclopedia of Science and Philosophy. Retrieved July 04, 2008 from http://www.iscid.org/encvclopedia/Actor-Network Theory 
 29. Latour B. Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts // Warwick Organizational Behaviour Staff (eds). Organizational Studies: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management (Vol. IV - Evil Empires), 2001 pp. 1842 - 72.
 30. Haraway D. A Game of Cat's Cradle: Science Studies, Feminist Theory, Cultural Studies // Configurations. 1994, V. 2. No.l, pp. 59 - 71.
 31. Body Image: An International Journal of Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier
 32. Scheglojf E. A. Body Torque // Social Research, Fall 1998 http://findarticles.com/p/articles/ni_m2267/is-3 - 65/ai-53461614 [retrieved, 4th July, 2008]
 33. Hall M. A. Feminism and Sporting Bodies: Essays on Theory and Practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 1996.
 34. Williams J. A Beautiful Game: International Perspectives on Women's Football. Oxford and New York: Berg, 2007.
 35. Shilling C. Changing Bodies (Published in association with Theory, Culture & Society). Sage Publications Ltd. 2008. 
 36. Shilling C. Embodying Sociology. Retrospect, Progress and Prospects. (Sociological Review Monograph Series). Oxford: Blackwell. 2007.
 37. Shilling C. The Body in Culture, Technology & Society. London, Newbury Park and New Delhi. 2005.
 38. Roberts B. Performative Social Science: A Consideration of Skills, Purpose and Context [122 paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), Art. 58, http://nbn-resol-ving.de/um:nbn:de:0114-fqs0802588 [retrieved, 4th July, 2008]
 39. Pirani B. M., Smith T. (eds) Mapping the Body: The Bodily Factor in Memory and Social Action. UK: Cambridge Scholars. 2008.
 40. Kalekin-Fishman D., Low K. (eds). Everyday Life in Asia: Social Perspectives on the Senses (forthcoming).
 41. Law J. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research London: Routledge. 2006.
 42. Lakatos I. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (ed.by J. A. C. G. Worrall). Cambridge: Cambridge Un-ty Press. 1970.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate