CORRELATION OF VALUES OF CULTURE WITH TYPES AND STANDARDS OF PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR OF RUSSIANS AND BYELORUSSIANS
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
CORRELATION OF VALUES OF CULTURE WITH TYPES AND STANDARDS OF PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR OF RUSSIANS AND BYELORUSSIANS
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000596-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
The results of cross-cultural study of values and prosocial behavior of Russian and Byelorussian students residing in the territory of Smolensk region (N = 132) are presented. The comparative analysis of values regulating behavior of ethnoses' representatives at the level of individual standard models is given. Similarities and differences of correlations between values of culture and types and standards of prosocial behavior due to culture-psychological peculiarities of Russians and Byelorussians are revealed. Similarities become apparent in the facts that orientation on values reflecting individual and group interests as well (Benevolence, Universalism) rises probability of prosocial behavior based on standards of justice, while orientation on values reflecting solely individual interests (Hedonism, Achievement) promotes public prosocial acts on the basis of standards of reciprocity. Specificity is in the fact that observed common regularities in correlation of value priorities with types, standards of prosocial behavior in Byelorussian sample are expressed stronger, and more definitely than in Russian sample.
Keywords
Values of culture, prosocial behavior, types, russians, byelorussians, standards of prosocial behavior
Date of publication
03.07.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
601
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Aronson Eh., Uilson T., Ehjkert R. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya. Psikhologicheskie zakony povedeniya cheloveka v sotsiume. SPb.: Prajm -Evroznak, 2002.
  2. Brazhnik Yu.V. Svyaz' psikhologicheskikh kharakteristik kul'tur i sotsial'nykh predstavlenij russkikh i belorusov o muzhskikh rolyakh: Diss.. kand. psikhol. nauk. Saratov, 2012.
  3. Gritsenko V.V. Problemy mezhkul'turnogo vzaimodejstviya v usloviyakh rossijsko-belorusskogo prigranich'ya//Vesnik Vitsebskaga dzyarzhajnaga universitehta. 2012. T. 5. № 71. S. 78-83.
  4. Il'in E.P. Motivatsiya i motivy. SPb.: Piter, 2000.
  5. Kirienko V.V. Belorusskaya mental'nost': istoki, sovremennost', perspektivy. Gomel': GGTU im. P.O. Sukhogo, 2009.
  6. Kondakov I.M. Psikhologicheskij slovar'. M.: OLMA Media Grupp, OLMA Press Obrazovanie, 2007.
  7. Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obschestvennomu progressu/Pod red. L. Kharrisona i S. Khantingtona. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanij, 2002.
  8. Kukhtova N.V., Domoratskaya N.V. Prosotsial'noe povedenie spetsialistov, orientirovannykh na okazanie pomoschi: teoreticheskie osnovy i metodiki izucheniya. Vitebsk: UO "VGU im. P.M. Masherova", 2011.
  9. Lebedeva N.M. Bazovye tsennosti russkoj kul'tury na rubezhe XXI veka//Psikhol. zhurnal. 2000. T. 21. № 3. S. 73-87.
  10. Lebedeva N.M. Tsennosti i otnoshenie k innovatsiyam: mezhkul'turnye razlichiya//Psikhol. zhurnal. 2009. T. 30. № 6. S. 81-92.
  11. Lebedeva N.M. Tsennostno-motivatsionnaya struktura lichnosti v russkoj kul'ture//Psikhol. zhurnal. 2001. T. 22. № 3. S. 47-51.
  12. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Tsennosti kul'tury i razvitie obschestva. M.: Izd. dom GU VShEh, 2007.
  13. Majers D. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya. SPb.: Piter, 2007.
  14. Naumenko L.I. Belorusskaya identichnost'. Soderzhanie. Dinamika. Sotsial'no-demograficheskaya i regional'naya spetsifika. Minsk: Belarus. navuka, 2012.
  15. Smotrova T.N., Gritsenko V.V. Tsennostnye orientatsii lichnosti i sklonnost' k narusheniyu sotsial'nykh norm//Psikhol. zhurn. 2009. T. 30. № 6. S. 3-16.
  16. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya/Sh. Tejlor, L. Piplo, D. Sirs. 10-e izd. SPb.: Piter, 2004.
  17. Titarenko L.G. Tsennostnyj mir sovremennogo belorusskogo obschestva: gendernyj aspekt. Minsk: BGU, 2004.
  18. Chaldini R., Kenrik D., Nejberg S. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya. Pojmi drugikh, chtoby ponyat' sebya! SPb.: Prajm-Evroznak, 2002.
  19. Chernyavskaya Yu.V. Narodnaya kul'tura i natsional'nye traditsii//Ehlektronnaya biblioteka Gumer. URL: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Culture/Chern/11.php (data obrascheniya 12.12.2013).
  20. Chernyavskaya Yu.V. Pyat' paradoksov natsional'nogo samosoznaniya belorusov//Indeks. 2001. № 15. URL: http://index.org.ru/journal/15/15-chern.html (data obrascheniya 12.12.2013).
  21. Shvarts Sh. Kul'turnye tsennostnye orientatsii: priroda i sledstviya natsional'nykh razlichij//Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2008. T. 5. № 2. S. 37-67.
  22. Yurevich A.V. Nravstvennaya degradatsiya kak ugroza natsional'noj bezopasnosti Rossii//Problemy psikhologicheskoj bezopasnosti/Otv.red. A.L. Zhuravlev, N.V. Tarabrina. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2012. S. 25-46.
  23. Carlo G., Hausmann A., Christiansen S., Randall B.A. Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents//The journal of early adolescence. 2003. V. 23. P. 107-134.
  24. Schwartz S.H. Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world/Comparing cultures, Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective/Eds. H. Vinken, J. Soeters, P. Ester. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2004. P. 43-73.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate