Везде
An account of children’s psychophysiological characteristics in making prognosis about efficiency of surgical premedication
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
An account of children’s psychophysiological characteristics in making prognosis about efficiency of surgical premedication
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000621-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
E. Lil'in  I. Ravich-Scherbo MIKHAIL MARIN Vyacheslav I. Trubnikov
Abstract

The effects of pre-operation preparation depend on the strength-sensitivity of the patient's nervous system. The standard premedication (promidol and atropin) is efficient for children with the strong nervous system but it is not efficient for the weak nervous system. For the patients with the weak nervous system the authors suggested 3-component premeication (seduxen, promedol, atropin). A method of prognostication was developed for evaluating the effects of patient’s drug preparation on the basis of their genetically determined psychophysiological indices.

Date of publication
01.05.1984
Number of purchasers
0
Views
353
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Val'dman A. V., Kozlovskaya M. M., Medvedev O. S. Farmakologicheskaya regulyatsiya ehmotsional'nogo stressa. M., 1979.2. Gindilis V. M., Finogenova S. A., Zhivotovskij L. A. Nekotorye aspekty geneticheskogo analiza poligennykh priznakov cheloveka na osnove semennykh korrelyatsij.— V kn.; Problemy geneticheskoj psnkhofnznolognn cheloveka. M., 1978, s. 196-2223. Gologorskij V. A. Klinicheskaya otsenka sedativnogo ehffekta premedikatsii. — V kn.: Materialy Vsesoyuznoj konferentsii anesteziologov i reanimatologov , M., 1966, s. 22—24.4. Gurevich K. M. Professional'naya prigodnost' i osnovnye svojstva nervnoj sistemy. M., 1970.5. Darbinyan T. M. Premedikatsiya, ee znachenie: mesto v anesteziologii.— V kn.: Trudy Vsesoyuznoj uchreditel'noj konferentsii anesteziologov i reanimatologov. M., 1966. s. 4—8.6 .Kavetskij R. £., Solodyuk I. F.. Vovk S. I. Razvitie ucheniya o tipakh VID. - V kn.: Reaktivnost' organizma i tip nervnoj sistemy. Kiev, 1961, s. 10 - 126.7. Lil'in E. T.. Kholodov L. E. Problemy klinicheskoj farmakogenetiki.—V kn.: Ocherki bliznetsovykh issledovanij. M., 1980, s. 40—82.8. Matveev V. F. Psikhologicheskie proyavleniya osnovnykh svojstv nervnoj sistemy u operatorov ehnergosistemy v obstanovke uslovnykh avarii.—V kn.. Tipologicheskie osobennosti VND cheloveka. M., 1965, t. 4, s. 34—57.9. Mozgovoj V. D. Issledovanie nasledstvennoj determinatsii proizvol'nogo vnimaniya.— v kn.: Problemy geneticheskoj psikhofiziologii cheloveka. M., 1978, s. 244-251.10.Mikhel'son V. A., Lil'in E. T.. Ostrejkov I. F.. Mar'in M. I. Psikhofiziologicheskoe issledovanie variabel'nosti reaktsij bol'nykh na premedikatsiyu v zavisimosti ot svojstva ikh nervnoj sistemy.—Anesteziologiya p reanimatologiya, 1979, No 3. s. 44-48.11. Nebylitsyn V. D. Osnovnye svojstva nervnoj sistemy cheloveka. M., 1966, s. 383.12. Polyakov L. E. Statisticheskie metody issledovaniya v meditsine i zdravookhranenii. L., 1971.13. Rozhdestvenskaya V. I., Golubeva Eh. A., Ermolaeva-Tomina L. B., Aleksandrova I. I., Klyagin V. S. K voprosu o funktsional'nykh sostoyaniyakh v svyazi slogicheskimi svojstvami nervnoj sistemy.— V kn.: Tipologicheskie osobennosti VND cheloveka. M.. 1967, t. 6, s. 103—124.14. Ravich-Scherbo I. V. Pervye itogi issledovaniya svojstv nervnoj sistemy bliznetsovym metodom.— V kn.: Psikhologiya i psikhofiziologiya individual'nykh razlichij. M., 1977, 89—99.15. Rusalov V. M. Biologicheskie osiovy iidividual'no-psikhologichsski.kh razlichij. M., 1979, s. 352.16. Chetyrkin E. M. Statisticheskie metody prognozirovaniya. M., 1975.17, Shlyakhta N. F., Panteleeva T. A. Issledovanie genotipicheskoj obuslovlennosti sindroma sily nervnoj sistemy.— V kn.: Problemy geneticheskoj psikhofiziologii cheloveka. M., 1978, s. 94—111.18. Antal M. Mutet elott alkalmezott gyoduszerek okozta anaestliesiologia problematik — Orvoskepzes, 1978, v. 53, L'' 1, p. 41—47.19. Claridge G., Canter S., Hume W. Personality differences and Biological variations: a Study of Twins.— International Series of Monographs in Experimental Psychology. N. Y., 1973.20. Claridge G. Sedation thresold variations and biological modeie of personalili.— In: XXII Intern. Congress of Psychology. Leipzig, 1980, v. 2, S. 537.21. Dobkiri A. B.. Isreal J. S.. Byles P. N. Double-blind study of methot rimeprazine, morphine, meperidine for preanestetig medication.—Anesth. Analg. Cur. Res„ 1965,445. p. 510-516.22. Hofman S. Zur Operations-Premedikation bei Sauglingen und Kleinkindcrn.— Z. Kinderchir., 1968, v. 2, No 2, p. 249—254.23. Mac Lead S. M., Giles H. G., Porter B.. Kaplan N. Z., Frecker R. S., Sellers E. M. Gender-related differences in diazepam dinamies.— Clin. Pharmacol, and Ther., 1979,V. 25, No 2, p. 236—240.24. Nagayaina H., Takagi A.. Sakurei V., Voshitoto S., Nishiwaki K. I-Iaxon iakypuraky dsacei.— Folia pharmacol. Japon., 1978, v. 74, p. 8.25. Riding I. Premedication.— In: Evans F., Grey T. General anesthesia. L., 1965, p. 75.26. Strauss E. N. Pharmacabedindte Veranderunden in Ergebnis von Personlichkeitstests.— In: Personlichkeitsdiagnostik. B., 1974, p. 264—278.27. Vergnot-Krigel C. L. angoisse pre-operatoi.— Psychol. Med., 1978, v. 10, No 5, p. 889—895.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate