M. EVERAERT, S. MUSGRAVE, A. DIMITRIADIS (EDS.). THE USE OF DATABASES IN CROSSLINGUISTIC STUDIES
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
M. EVERAERT, S. MUSGRAVE, A. DIMITRIADIS (EDS.). THE USE OF DATABASES IN CROSSLINGUISTIC STUDIES
Annotation
PII
S0373-658X0000392-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
142-151
Abstract
Вопросы языкознания, M. EVERAERT, S. MUSGRAVE, A. DIMITRIADIS (EDS.). THE USE OF DATABASES IN CROSSLINGUISTIC STUDIES
Keywords
review, databases, linguistic typology
Number of purchasers
1
Views
474
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Mel'chuk 1998 -IA Mel'chuk. Kurs obshchej morfologii. T. 2. CH. 2. M.; Vena, 1998.
2. Polyakov, Solov'ev 2006 -VN P ol yak ov VD S ol ov 'e v. Komp'yuternye modeli i metody v tipologii i komparativistike. Kazan', 2006.
3. Solov'ev 2010 -VD S ol ov 'e v. Tipologicheskie bazy dannyh: perspektivy ispol'zovaniya // VYA. 2010. № 1.
4. Auwera, Plungian 1998 -J. Auwera, V. Plungian. Modality's semantic map // Linguistic typology. 1998. V. 2.
5. Bailey 1995 -M. Bailey. Nonmetrical constraints on stress. Ph. D. dissertation. University of Minnesota. 1995.
6. Blake 1994 -B. Blake. Case. Cambridge, 1994.
7. Buneman et al. (eds.) 2001 -P. Buneman, S. Bird, M. Liberman (eds.). IRCS Workshop on linguistic databases. Philadelphia (Pennsylvania), 2001.
8. Chomsky, Halle 1968 -N. Chomsky, M. Halle. The sound pattern of English. New York, 1968.
9. Comrie, Smith 1977 -V Comrie, N. Smith. Lingua descriptive series: Questionnaire // Lingua. 42. 1977.
10. Corbett 2000 -G. Corbett. Number. Cambridge, 2000.
11. Corbett 2006 -G. Corbett. Agreement. Cambridge, 2006.
12. Everaert 2003 -M. Everaert. The use of databases in linguistic theorizing // Abstracts of the XVII International congress of linguists. Prague, 2003.
13. Goedemans, Hulst 1996 -R. Goedemans, H. Hulst. StressTyp manual. Leiden, 1996.
14. Gordon 2002 -M. Gordon. A factorial typology of quantity insensitive stress // Natural language and linguistic theory. 2002. 20.
15. Greenberg 1963 -J. Greenberg. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements // J. Greenberg (ed.).
16. Universals of language. Cambridge, 1963.
17. Haspelmath 2005 -M. Haspelmath. Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types // Linguistic discovery. 2005. 3(1).
18. Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2005 -M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil, B. Comrie (eds.). The world atlas of language structures. Oxford, 2005.
19. Hewitt, Khiba 1989 -G. Hewitt, Z. Khiba. Abkhaz. London, 1989.
20. Hulst (ed.) 1999 -H. Hulst (ed.). Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe. Berlin, 1999.
21. Liberman 1997 -M. Liberman. Introduction to the Linguistic Data Consortium. http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/ About/ldc-intro.shtml. 1997.
22. MacWhinney 1995 -B. MacWhinney. The CHILDES project: Tools for analysing talk. Hillsdale (NJ), 1995.
23. Nerbonne (ed.) 1998 -J. Nerbonne (ed.).
24. Linguistic databases. Stanford, 1998.
25. Nichols 1992 -J. Nichols. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago; London, 1992.
26. Polyakov et al. 2009 -V. Polyakov, V. Solovyev, S. Wichmann, O. Belyaev. Using WALS and Jazyki Mira // Linguistic typology. 2009. V. 13.
27. Siewierska 1999 -A. Siewierska. From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical agreement marker: Why objects don't make it // Folia Linguistica. 1999. V. 33. № 2.
28. Stuckenschmidt, Harmelen 2005 - H. Stuckenschmidt, F. Harmelen. Information sharing on the semantic web. Berlin, 2005.
29. Wichmann, Kamholz 2008 -S. Wichmann.
30. D. Kamholz. A stability metric for typological features // Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung. 2008. 61.3.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate