Везде
On the typology of verbal systems having several forms of plusquamperfect: casus latinus
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
On the typology of verbal systems having several forms of plusquamperfect: casus latinus
Annotation
PII
S0373-658X0000616-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Dmitri Sichinava 
Edition
Issue 5
Pages
40-52
Abstract
Вопросы языкознания, On the typology of verbal systems having several forms of plusquamperfect: casus latinus
Keywords
discontinuous past, Latin, past, pluperfect, taxis, tense
Date of publication
05.09.2003
Number of purchasers
0
Views
473
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. D. Vajs. Dvojnye glagoly v russkom yazyke // Konferentsiya "Yazykoznanie sub specie rusistiki". IRYa RAN. 16.VI.2001 (raspechatka k dokladu). 
 2. A.A. Zaliznyak. Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt. M., 1995. 
 3. N.A. Kozintseva. Plyuskvamperfekt v armyanskom yazyke // Tipologiya vida: problemy, poiski, resheniya. M., 1998. 
 4. T.A. Majsak, S.G. Tatevosov. Yadernye formy glagol'noj paradigmy // Bagvalinskij yazyk. Grammatika. Teksty. Slovari / A. E. Kibrik (red.-sost.). M., 2001. 
 5. V.P. Liperovskij. Glagol v yazyke khindi. M., 1984. 
 6. V.A. Plungyan. Plyuskvamperfekt i pokazateli "retrospektivnogo sdviga" // Yazyk. Afrika. Ful'be: sb. nauchn. statej v chest' A. I. Koval'. SPb., 1998. 
 7. V.A. Plungyan. Antirezul'tativ: do i posle rezul'tata // Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. 1: Grammaticheskie kategorii. M., 2001. 
 8. D.V. Sichinava. Plyuskvamperfekt i retrospektivnyj sdvig v yazyke santali // Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. 1: Grammaticheskie kategorii. M., 2001. 
 9. D.V. Sichinava. Tipologiya glagol'nykh sistem s neskol'kimi formami plyuskvamperfekta. Diplomnaya rabota. MGU., 2002. 
 10. O.B. Tkachenko. Sopostavitel'no-istoricheskaya frazeologiya slavyanskikh i finno-ugorskikh yazykov. K., 1979. 
 11. I.A. Shoshitajshvili. Funktsii i status plyuskvamperfekta v glagol'noj sisteme. Dis.. kand. filol. nauk. RGGU., 1998. 
 12. T. Arnavielle. Remarques sur l'emploi du plus-que-parfait de l'indicatif en francais moderne // Mélanges de philologie romane offerts a Charles Camproux. V. 2. Montpelier, 1978. 
 13. O. Becker. Die Entwicklung des lateinischen Plusquamperfekt-Indikativs im Spanischen. Leipzig, 1928. 
 14. P.M. Bertinetto. Temporal reference, aspect and actionality: their neutralization and interactions, mostly exemplified in Italian // Tense, Aspect and Action: Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology / Eds. C. Bachs, H. Basb0ll, C.-E. Lindberg. V., 1994. 
 15. B. Comrie. Tense. Cambridge, 1985. 
 16. Ö. Dahl. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford, 1985. 
 17. Donati de partibus orationis ars minor (s parallel'nym perevodom M. S. Petrovoj: Donat. Kratkaya nauka o chastyakh rechi) // Dialog so vremenem 1. M., 1999 (ehlektronnaya versiya: http://www.krotov.org / acts / 04 / 1999petr.html). 
 18. A. Duraffour. La survivance du plus-que-parfait de l'indicatif latin en francoprovençal // Romania 60. 1934. 
 19. A. Ernout, Fr. Thomas. Syntaxe latine. 2-eme ed. P., 1972. 
 20. F. Fici Giusti. Struttura semantica e sintattica dell'imperfetto composto in italiano e in russo. V pech. 
 21. S. Fleischman. Temporal distance: a basic linguistic metaphor // Studies in language, 13.1,1989. 
 22. V.A. Friedman. The Pluperfect in Albanian and Macedonian // Folia Slavica. Columbus. OH. V. 4. 1981. №2-3. 
 23. Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid, 1931. 
 24. I. Herméren. El uso de la forma en -ra con valor no-subjuntivo en el español moderno (Etudes romanes de Lund, 49). Lund, 1992. 
 25. J.B. Hofmann. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik / Neubearbeitet von A. Szantyr. München, 1965. 
 26. O. Jespersen. The Philosophy of Grammar. L., 1924. 
 27. N.-K. Kim. The double past in Korean // Foundations of Language 12. 1974. 
 28. F. Klein-Andreu. Losing ground: A discourse-pragmatic solution to the history of -ra in Spanisch // Discourse-Pragmatics and the Verb: The evidence from Romance / Eds. S. Fleischman, L. Vaugh. L., 1991. 
 29. P. V. Lunn, T. D. Cravens. A contextual reconsideration of the Spanish -ra "indicative" // Discourse-Pragmatics and the Verb: The evidence from Romance / Eds. S. Fleischman, L. Vaugh. L., 1991. 
 30. M. Marin. Formes verbales periphrastiques de I'indicatif dans les parlers dacoroumains // Revue roumaine de la lingustique 30. 1985. 
 31. S. Mellet. L'imparfait de l'indicatif en latin classique: temps, aspect, modalite. Louvain, 1988. 
 32. S. Mellet. Les temps du passé: le plus-que-parfait; Les temps du futur: le futur du perfectum; Les temps du subjonctif: le subjonctif plus-que-parfait // S. Mellet, M.D. Joffre, G. Serbat. Grammaire fondamentale du latin: le signifié du verbe. Louvain, 1994. 
 33. S. Mellet. Le parfait latin, un preteritum perfectum // Passé et parfait (Cahiers Chronos, 6) / Eds. A. Carlier, V. Lagae, C. Benninger. Amsterdam-Atlanta, 2000. 
 34. R. Salkie. Perfect and Pluperfect: What is the relationship? // Journal of linguistics. V. 25. 1989. № 1. 
 35. M. Squartini. On the semantics of pluperfect: evidences from Germanic and Romance // Linguistic typology. 1999. № 3. 
 36. S. Steele. Past and irrealis: just what does it all mean? // International Journal of American linguistics. V. 41. 1975. № 3. 
 37. K. Togeby. Le sort du plus-que-parfait latin dans les langues romanes // Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 22. 1966. 
 38. V. V.äänänen. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Nouvelle éd. revue. P., 1967.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate