References

Additional sources and materials

1. Hymes D., Fought J. American structuralism. The Hague, 1981. P. 22.
 2. Stepanov Yu.'S. V trekhmernom prostranstve yazyka: Semioticheskie problemy lingvistiki, filosofii, iskusstva. M., 1985.
 3. Bloomfield L. Why a linguistic society? //Language. 1925. V. 1. № 1.
 4. HaugenE. Directions in modern linguistics//Language, 1951. V. 27. № 3. P. 211.
 5. Haugen E. Half a century of the Linguistic Society// Language. 1974. V. 50. № 4.
 6. Newmeyer F. J. Linguistic theory in America. 2-nd ed. Orlando, 1986.
 7. Cole P. The interface of theory and description // Language. 1976. V. 52. № 3.
 8. Brekle H. Einfiihrung in die Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft. Darmstadt, 1985. S. 3.
 9. Hjelmslev L. Sproget: En introduktion. K0benhavn, 1963. S. 7.
 10. Karaulov Yu. N. Ehvolyutsiya, sistema i obscherusskij yazykovoj tip // Rusistika segodnya: Yazyk: Sistema i ee funktsionirovanie. M., 1988. S. 6.
 11. Hall R. A., Jr. Linguistic theory in the Italian Renaissance // Language. 1936 V. 12, № 2, P. 96.
 12. Staal J. F. A method of linguistic description: The order of consonants according to Panini // Language. 1962. V. 38. № 1. P. 3.
 13. NootenB. A. van. Panini's replacement technique and the active finite verb // Language. 1967. V. 43. № 4. P. 899.
 14. CardonaG. Negation in Panini's rules // Language. 1967. V. 43. № 1. P. 34—56.
 15. Aarsleff H. The history of linguistics and Professor Chomsky//Language.? 1970. V. 46. № 3. P. 571.
 16. Aarsleff II. The study of language in England. 1780—1860. Princeton, 1967.
 17. Chomsky N. Cartesian linguistics. N. Y., 1966.
 18. Swadesh M. Edward Sapir (Obituary) // Language. 1939. V. 15. № 2. P. 133.
 19. Bloch B. Leonard Bloomfield (Obituary) // Language. 1949. V. 25. № 2. P. 87—98.
 20. Harris Z. //Language. 1951. V. 27. № 3. Rec: Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality.
 21. Silverstein M. Closing statement // New perspectives in language, culture, and personality: Proc. of the Edward Sapir Centenary Conference (Ottawa, 1—3 October, 1984). Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 1986. P. 594.
 22. Sapir E. The status of linguistics as a science // Language. 1929. V. 5. № 4.
 23. Hockett Ch. A system of descriptive phonology// Language, 1942. V. 18. № 1.
 24. Robins R. H. Noun and verb in universal grammars // Language. 1952. V. 28. № 3. Pt 1.
 25. Lenneberg E. H. Cognition in ethnolinguistics//Language. 1953. V. 29. № 4.
 26. Lees R. V. II Language, 1957. V. 33. № 3. P. 375. Rec: Chomsky N. Syntactic structures.
 27. Lehmann W. P. Subjectivity // Language. 1974. V. 50. № 4. P. 627.
 28. Halle M. Confessio grammatici: The presidential address delivered at the Golden Anniversary Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America in New York, 29 December 1974//Language. 1975. V. 51. №3 . P. 525.
 29. Percival W. K. The applicability of Kuhn's paradigms to the history of linguistics // Language. 1976. V. 52. № 2.
 30. Lakojf R. T. II Language. 1978. V. 54. № 2. P. 392. Rec: Edelson M. Language and interpretation in psychoanalysis.
 31. FodorJ.D. Semantics: Theories of meaning in generative grammar. N. Y., 1977. P. 103.
 32. Yngve V. H. Linguistics as a science. Bloomington, 1986.
 33. O'Grady W. Principles of grammar and learning. Chicago; London, 1987. P. XI.
 34. Swadesh M., Voegelin C. F. A problem in morphological alternation//Language. 1939. V. 15, № 1.
 35. Bloomfleld L. Twenty-one year of the Linguistic Society//Language. 1946. V. 22.
 № 1. P. 3.
 36. Block V. A set of postulates for phonemic analysis//Language. 1948. V. 24. № 1.
 Jr . O.
 37. Bloomfield L. A set of postulates for the science of Language // Language. 1926. V. 2.
 P. 143-144.
 38. Chomsky N. Barriers. Cambridge (Mass.), 1986. P. 2.
 39. Chomsky N. Logical syntax and semantics: Their Linguistic relevance // Language.
 1955. V. 31. № 1. pt 1.
 40. Bar-HillelY. Indexical expressions//Mind. 1954. V. 63.
 41. Aronojf M. Contextuals//Language. 1980. V. 56. № i.
 42. Halle M., Mohanan K. P. Segmental phonology of modern English//Linguistic
 inquiry. 1985. V. 16. № 1.
 43. Garvin P. Computer participation in linguistic research // Language. 1962. V. 38.
 № 4.
 44. Shapiro M. Explorations into markedness//Language. 1972. V. 48. № 2. P. 343.
 45. Stepanov Yu. S. Metody i printsipy sovremennoj lingvistiki. M., 1975. S. 14.
 46. Arutyunova N. D., Klimov G. A., Kubryakova E. S. Amerikanskij strukturalizm.//
 Osnovnye napravleniya strukturalizma. M., 1964.
 47. Bloomfield L. Language or ideas?//Language. 1936. V. 12. № 2.
 48. Blumfild L. Yazyk. M., 1968. S. 47.
 49. Sebeok T. II Language. 1943. V. 19. № 2. R. 196. Rec: Tihany L. S. A modern
 Hungarian grammar.
 50. Bloomfield L. Secondary and tertiary responses to language// Language. 1944. V. 20.
 № 1. P. 52-53.
 51. SpitzerL. Answer to Mr. Bloomfield//Language. 1944. V. 20. №4 .
 52. Hatcher A. G. Syntax and the sentence//Word. 1956. V. 12.
 53. Katz J. J. Mentalism in linguistics // Language. 1964. V. 40. № 2. P. 126.
 54. FodorJ. A., V ever T. G., Garrett M. G. The psychology of language: An introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. N. Y., 1974.
 55. Zvegintsev V. A. Predlozhenie i ego otnoshenie k yazyku i rechi. M., 1976. S. 63.
 56. Dem'yankovV. 3. Spetsial'nye teorii interpretatsij v vychislitel'noj-lingvistike. M., 1988.
 57. Auwera J. van der. Language and logic: A speculative and condition-theoretic study.
 Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 1985.
 58. Voloshinov V. N. Marksizm i filosofiya yazyka: Osnovnye problemy sotsiologicheskogo metoda v nauke o yazyke. L., 1929. S. 41—50.
 59. Weiss A. P. Linguistics and philosophy//Language. 1925. V. 1. № 2. P. 52.
 60. Chafe W. Language and symbolization//Language. 1967. V. 43. № 1. P. 57.
 61. Heath J. Some functional relationships in grammar//Language. 1975. V. 51. № 1.
 62. Shapiro M. Russian conjugation: Theory and hermeneutic// Language. 1980. V. 56. .
 № 1. P. 67.
 63. Haiman J. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation // Language.
 1980. V. 56. № 3.
 64. Russell V. An inquiry into meaning and truth; The William James lectures for 1940
 delivered at Harvard University. L., 1940.
 65. Gamkrelidze T. V. The problem of Tarbitriare du signe' // Language. 1974. V. 50.
 № 1. P. 102.
 66. WhorfB. L. The punctual and segmentative aspects of verbs in Hopi//Language
 1936. V. 12. № 11. P. 130.
 6* 147
 67. Hill J. H. Possible continuity theories of language//Language. 1974. V. 50. № 1.
 P. 134.
 68. Woodbury A. C. Meaningful phonological processes: A consideration of Central Alaskan Yupik Eskimo prosody//Language. 1987. V. 63. № 4. P. 685.
 69. Frishberg N. Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American sign language // Language. 1975. V. 51. № 3. P. 696.
 70. Robertson J. From symbol to icon: The evolution of the pronominal system from
 Common Mayan to Modern Yucatecan//Language. 1983. V. 59. № 3. P. 529.
 71. Osgood Ch., Richards M. M. From Yang and Yin to and or but II Language. 1973.
 V. 49. № 2.
 72. Chafe W. Language and consciousness//Language. 1974. V. 50. № 1. P. 111.
 73. Kay P., McDaniel Ch. K. The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color
 terms // Language. 1978. V. 54. № 3. P. 610.
 74. Berlin V., Kay P. Basic color terms, their universality and evolution. Berkeley;
 Los Angeles, 1969.
 75. Aginsky V., Aginsky E. The importance of language universals // Word. 1948. V. 4.
 76. Greenberg J. II. Synchronic and diachronic universals in phonology // Language.
 1966. V. 42. № 3^ P. 511.