References

1. 1. Arkad’ev 2012 — Arkad’ev P. M. [Review of:] A. L. Malchukov, M. Haspelmath, B. Comrie (eds.). Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook. Berlin, 2010. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 110—118.
2. 2. Paducheva 2004 — Paducheva E. V. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki [Dynamic models in the semantics of lexicon]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2004.
3. 3. Testelets 2001 — Testelets Ya. G. Vvedenie v obshchii sintaksis [Introduction to general syntax]. Moscow: Russian State Univ. for the Humanities, 2001.
4. 4. Alexiadou 2001 — Alexiadou A. Functional structure in nominals: Nominalizations and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001.
5. 5. Bates, MacWhinney 1987 — Bates E., MacWhinney B. Competition, variation, and language learning. Mechanisms of language acquisition. MacWhinney B. (ed.). Hillsdale (NJ); London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987. Pp. 157—193.
6. 6. Bates, MacWhinney 1989 — Bates E., MacWhinney B. Functionalism and the competition model. The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing. MacWhinney B., Bates E. (eds.). New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989. Pp. 77—117.
7. 7. Bornkessel 2002 — Bornkessel I. The argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to incremental interpretation. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2002.
8. 8. Bornkessel, Schlesewsky 2006 — Bornkessel I., Schlesewsky M. The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension among languages. Psychological Review. 2006. Vol. 113. Pp. 787—821.
9. 9. Croft 2001 — Croft W. A. Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2001.
10. 10. Dik 1989 — Dik S. C. The theory of functional grammar. Part. 1: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris, 1989.
11. 11. Dressler 1986 — Dressler W. U. Explanation of natural morphology, illustrated with comparative and agentnoun formation. Linguistics. 1986. Vol. 24. Pp. 519—548.
12. 12. Gabelenz 1901 — von der Gabelenz G. Die Sprachwissenchaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. 2. Aufl. Leipzig: Tauschniz, 1901.
13. 13. Goldberg 1995 — Goldberg A. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1995.
14. 14. Haspelmath 2006 — Haspelmath M. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics. 2006. Vol. 42. No. 1. Pp. 25—70.
15. 15. Haspelmath, Karjus (in print) — Haspelmath M., Karjus A. Explaining asymmetries in number marking: Singulatives, pluratives and usage frequency. Linguistics. 2017. Vol. 55. (in print).
16. 16. Hawkins 1994 — Hawkins J. A. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.
17. 17. Hawkins 2004 — Hawkins J. A. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2004.
18. 18. Heine et al. 2013 — Heine B., Kaltenböck G., Kuteva T., Long H. An outline of discourse grammar. Functional approaches to language. Bischoff Sh. T., Jany C. (eds.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2013. Pp. 155—206.
19. 19. Hopper 1988 — Hopper P. J. Emergent grammar and the apriori grammar postulate. Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. Tannen D. (ed.). Norwood (NJ): Ablex, 1988. Pp. 117—134.
20. 20. Kaltenböck et al. 2011 — Kaltenböck G., Heine B., Kuteva T. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language. 2011. Vol. 35. Pp. 852—897.
21. 21. MacWhinney 2005 — MacWhinney B. The emergence of linguistic form in time. Connection Science. 2005. Vol. 17. Pp. 191—211.
22. 22. MacWhinney, O’Grady 2015 — MacWhinney B., O’Grady W. (eds.). The handbook of language emergence. New York: Blackwell Publ., 2015.
23. 23. Malchukov et al. 2010 — Malchukov A. L., Haspelmath M., Comrie B. Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook. Malchukov A. L., Haspelmath M., Comrie B. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2010. Pp. 1—64.
24. 24. Martinet 1955 — Martinet A. Économie des changements phonétiques. Berne: Francke, 1955.
25. 25. Mattys et al. 2005 — Mattys S. L., White L., Melhorn J. F. Integration of multiple segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2005. Vol. 134. Pp. 477—500.
26. 26. Moravcsik 2010 — Moravcsik E. Conflict resolution in syntactic theory. Studies in Language. 2010. Vol. 34. Pp. 636—669.
27. 27. Newmeyer 1992 — Newmeyer F. J. Iconicity and generative grammar. Language. 1992. Vol. 68. No. 4. Pp. 756—796.
28. 28. Prince, Smolensky 1993 — Prince A., Smolensky P. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical report no. 2 of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers Univ., 1993.
29. 29. Seiter 1980 — Seiter W. J. Studies in Niuean syntax. New York: Garland Publ., 1980.
30. 30. Wiechmann, Lohmann 2012 — Wiechmann D., Lohmann A. Domain minimization and beyond: Modeling PP ordering. Language Variation and Change. 2012. Vol. 25. No. 1. Pp. 65—88.