References

1. 1. Zalizniak 1980 — Zalizniak A. A. Grammaticheskii slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Grammatical dictionary of Russian]. Moscow: Russkii Yazyk, 1980.
2. 2. NKRYa — Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka [Russian National Corpus]. Available at: http://www.ruscorpora.ru.
3. 3. Plungian 2000 — Plungian V. A. Obshchaya morfologiya. Vvedenie v problematiku [General morphology. Introduction to the problematics]. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2000.
4. 4. Plungian 2002 — Plungian V. A. Towards the semantics of Russian locative («2nd prepositional» case). Semiotika i informatika. 2002. No. 37. Pp. 229—254.
5. 5. Ackerman, Malouf 2013 — Ackerman F., Malouf R. Morphological organization: The low conditional entropy conjecture. Language. 2013. Vol. 89. No. 3. Pp. 429—464.
6. 6. Ackerman et al. 2009 — Ackerman F., Blevins J., Malouf R. Parts and wholes: Patterns of relatedness in complex morphological systems and why they matter. Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition. Blevins J. P., Blevins J. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2009. Pp. 54—82.
7. 7. Albright 2003 — Albright A. A quantitative study of Spanish paradigm gaps. Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Garding G., Tsujimura M. (eds.). Somerville (MA): Cascadilla Press, 2003. Pp. 1—14.
8. 8. Albright 2009 — Albright A. Lexical and morphological conditioning of paradigm gaps. Modeling ungrammaticality in Optimality Theory. Blaho S., Rice C. (eds.). London: Equinox, 2009. Pp. 117—164.
9. 9. Anderson 2010 — Anderson S. R. Failing one’s obligations: Defectiveness in Rumantsch reflexes of dēbēre. Defective paradigms: Missing forms and what they tell us. Baerman M., Corbett G. G., Brown D. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010. Pp. 19—34.
10. 10. Baerman et al. 2010 — Baerman M., Corbett G. G., Brown D. (eds.). Defective paradigms: Missing forms and what they tell us. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010.
11. 11. Boyé, Cabredo-Hofherr 2010 — Boyé G., Cabredo-Hofherr P. Defectiveness as stem suppletion in French and Spanish verbs. Defective paradigms: Missing forms and what they tell us. Baerman M., Corbett G. G., Brown D. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010. Pp. 35—52.
12. 12. Bybee, Moder 1983 — Bybee J. L., Moder C. L. Morphological classes as natural categories. Language. 1983. Vol. 59. No. 2. Pp. 251—270.
13. 13. Finkel, Stump 2007 — Finkel R. A., Stump G. T. Principal parts and morphological typology. Morphology. 2007. Vol. 17. Pp. 39—75.
14. 14. Halle 1973 — Halle M. Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry. 1974. Vol. 4. No. 1. Pp. 3—16.
15. 15. Pertsova 2005 — Pertsova K. How lexical conservatism can lead to paradigm gaps. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics. 2005. No. 11. Pp. 13—30.
16. 16. Piperski 2015 — Piperski A. To be or not to be: Corpora as indicators of (non-)existence. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue”. 2015. Vol. 1. No. 14. Pp. 515—522.
17. 17. Sims 2006 — Sims A. Minding the gaps: Inflectional defectiveness in a paradigmatic theory. Doct. diss. Colambus (OH): Ohio State Univ., 2006. Available at: https://slavic.osu.edu/sites/slavic.osu.edu/files/sims_dissertation_2006.pdf
18. 18. Stump 2010 — Stump G. T. Interactions between defectiveness and syncretism. Defective paradigms: Missing forms and what they tell us. Baerman M., Corbett G. G., Brown D. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010. Pp. 181—210.
19. 19. Stump, Finkel 2013 — Stump G. T., Finkel R. A. Morphological typology: From word to paradigm. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013.
20. 20. Tomasello 2000 — Tomasello M. First steps towards a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics. 2000. Vol. 11. No. 1. Pp. 61—82.