References

1. 1. Panov 2016 — Panov V. A. Buryat final particles in areal-typological perspective. Uralo-altaiskie issledovaniya. 2016. No. 4 (23). Pp. 121–128.
2. 2. Prasol 1999 — Prasol A. F. Zaklyuchitel’nye modal’no-ekspressivnye chastitsy v yaponskoi rechi [Final modal expressive particles in Japanese speech]. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Federal Univ. Publ., 1999.
3. 3. Blakemore 1987 — Blakemore D. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
4. 4. Chan 2013 — Chan B. H.-Sh. Sentence-final particles, complementizers, antisymmetry, and the finaloverfinal constraint. Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word order. Biberauer Th., Sheehan M. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2013. Pp. 445–468.
5. 5. Cinque 1999 — Cinque G. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1999.
6. 6. Cooke 1989 — Cooke J. R. Thai sentence particles: Forms, meanings, and formal-semantic variations. Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics. 1989. Vol. 12. No. 12. Thai Sentence Particles and Other Topics. Pp. 1–90.
7. 7. Foolen 1994 — Foolen A. [Review of:] Andvik E. Pragmatic analysis of the Norwegian modal particles. Lingua. Vol. 93. No. 4. Pp. 307–312.
8. 8. Foolen 1996 — Foolen A. Pragmatic Particles. Handbook of pragmatics. Verschoeren J., Ola-Östmann J., Blommaert J., Bulcaen C. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996.
9. 9. Haselow 2012 — Haselow A. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language & Communication. Vol. 32. No. 3. Pp. 182–204.
10. 10. Heine et al. 2013 — Heine B., Kaltenböck G., Kuteva T., Long H. An outline of discourse grammar. Functional approaches to language. Boschoff Sh., Jany C. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. Pp. 175–233.
11. 11. Hopper 1991 — Hopper P. J. On some principle of grammaticalization. Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol. 1. Traugott E., Heine B. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1991. Pp. 17–35.
12. 12. Kayne 1994 — Kayne R. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1994.
13. 13. Le 2015 — Le G. H. Vietnamese sentence final particles. PhD diss. Los-Angeles: Univ. of Southern California, 2015.
14. 14. Linell 2005 — Linell P. The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins, and transformations. London: Routledge, 2005.
15. 15. Luke 1990 — Luke K. K. Utterance particles in Cantonese conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1990.
16. 16. Mulder, Thompson 2008 — Mulder J., Thompson S. The grammaticalization of but as a final particle in English conversation. Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions. Laury R. (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008. Pp. 179–204.
17. 17. Ogden 2004 — Ogden R. Non-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnish. Sound patterns in interaction. Couper-Kuhlen E., Ford C. E. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004. Pp. 29–62.
18. 18. Shapiro 2012 — Shapiro R. Chinese Pidgin Russian. Pidgins and creoles in Asia. Ansaldo U. (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012. Pp. 1–58.
19. 19. Sperber, Wilson 1986 / 1995 — Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986; 2nd ed. with a postface 1995.
20. 20. Thompson, Suzuki 2012 — Thompson S., Suzuki R. The grammaticalization of final particles. The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Narrog H., Heine B. (eds.). London: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012. Pp. 668–680.
21. 21. Traugott 2010 — Traugott E. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Davidse K., Vandelotte L., Cuyckens H. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2010. Pp. 29–71.