RAS History & PhilologyВопросы языкознания Voprosy Jazykoznanija

  • ISSN (Print) 0373-658X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5243

Review of the book: A. De Wit. The present perfective paradox across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017

PII
S0373658X0001402-1-1
DOI
10.31857/S0373658X0001402-1
Publication type
Review
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 5
Pages
131-136
Abstract

  

Keywords
Date of publication
08.10.2018
Year of publication
2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
678

References

  1. 1. Gusev V. Yu. Aspect in Nganasan. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 6: Tipologiya aspektual’nykh sistem i kategorii. (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy ILI RAN. Vol. 8. Part 2.). Golovko E. V., Daniel M. A., Plungian V. A., Semenova Ks. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2012. Pp. 311–360.
  2. 2. Zaliznyak A. A. On a certain use of praesens of the perfective verb («praesens of vain expectations»). Metody formalne w opisie języków słowiańskich. Saloni Z. (ed.). Białystok: W-wo Univ. Warszawskiego, 1990. Pp. 109–114.
  3. 3. Zaliznyak Anna A. Praesens of perfective verbs in the meaning of the present tense. Zaliznyak Anna A., Mikaelyan I. L., Shmelev A. D. Russkaya aspektologiya: V zashchitu vidovoi pary. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2015. Pp. 314–329.
  4. 4. Plungian V. A. Towards a typology of the perfect in the world’s languages. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 7: Perfekt i smezhnye kategorii. (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy ILI RAN. Vol. 12. Part 2.). Maisak T. A., Plungian V. A., Semenova Ks. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2016. Pp. 7–36.
  5. 5. Urmančieva A. Yu. Tense, aspect or modality? Verbal system of the Enets language. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 2006. No. 4. Pp. 84–100.
  6. 6. Shluinskii A. B. Factative and related categories: An attempt of typology. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 6: Tipologiya aspektual’nykh sistem i kategorii. (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy ILI RAN. Vol. 8. Part 2.). Golovko E. V., Daniel’ M. A., Plungian V. A., Semenova Ks. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2012. Pp. 950–996.
  7. 7. Bybee et al. 1994 — Bybee J. L., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1994.
  8. 8. Dickey 2000 — Dickey S. M. Parameters of Slavic aspect: A cognitive approach. Stanford (CA): CSLI, 2000.
  9. 9. Giorgi, Pianesi 1997 — Giorgi A., Pianesi F. Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997.
  10. 10. Malchukov 2009 — Malchukov A. Incompatible categories: Resolving the “present perfective paradox”. Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality. Hogeweg L., de Hoop H., Malchukov A. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009. Pp. 13–32.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library