1. Benveniste 1974/1952 — Benveniste É. The passive construction of the transitive perfect. Benveniste É. Obshchaya lingvistika [General linguistics]. Moscow: Progress, 1974. Pp. 192—202.] (Benveniste É. La construction passive du parfait transitif. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris. 1952. Vol. 48. Pp. 52—62.)

2. Lezov 2009 — Lezov S. V. Aramaic languages. Yazyki mira. Semitskie yazyki. Akkadskiy yazyk. Severozapadnosemitskie yazyki. Belova A. G., Kogan L. E., Lezov S. V., Romanova O. E. (eds.). Moscow: Academia, 2009. Pp. 414—496.

3. Pireyko 1968 — Pireyko L. A. Osnovnye voprosy ergativnosti na materiale indoiranskikh yazykov [Basic issues of ergativity in Indo-Iranian languages]. Moscow: Nauka, 1968.

4. Coghill 2014 — Coghill E. Differential object marking in Neo-Aramaic. Linguistics. 2014. Vol. 52. No. 2. Pp. 335—364.

5. Donohue, Wichman (eds.) 2008 — Donohue M., Wichman S. (eds.). The typology of semantic alignment. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008.

6. Gildea 1992 — Gildea S. Comparative Cariban morphosyntax: On the genesis of ergativity in independent clauses. PhD dissertation. Eugene: Univ. of Oregon, 1992.

7. Gildea 1998 — Gildea S. On reconstructing grammar: Comparative Cariban morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1998.

8. Haig 2008 — Haig G. Alignment change in Iranian languages: A Construction Grammar approach. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2008.

9. Harris 1985 — Harris A. C. Diachronic syntax: The Kartvelian case. San Diego (CA): Academic Press, 1985.

10. Jügel 2015 — Jügel Th. Die Entwicklung der Ergativkonstruktion im Alt- und Mitteliranischen. Eine korpusbasierte Untersuchung zu Kasus, Kongruenz und Satzbau. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2015.

11. Stroński 2011 — Stroński K. Synchronic and diachronic aspects of ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Wydawnictwo naukowe UAM, 2011.