RAS History & PhilologyВопросы языкознания Voprosy Jazykoznanija

  • ISSN (Print) 0373-658X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5243

A. Holvoet, N. Nau (eds). Grammatical relations and their non-canonical encoding in Baltic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014

PII
S0373658X0011213-3-1
DOI
10.31857/S0373658X0011213-3
Publication type
Review
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 6
Pages
140-151
Abstract

    

Keywords
review article, argument structure, Baltic, syntactic relations
Date of publication
25.11.2015
Year of publication
2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
483

References

  1. 1. Paducheva, Uspenskij 2002 — Paducheva E. V., Uspenskij V. A. Podlezhaschee ili skazuemoe? (Semanticheskij kriterij razlicheniya podlezhaschego i skazuemogo v binominativnykh predlozheniyakh) // Uspenskij V. A. Trudy po nematematike. T. 1. M.: OGI, 2002. (Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka. T. 38. 1979. S. 349—360). [Paducheva E. V., Uspenskij V. A. A subject or a predicate? (A semantic criterion for distinguishing between subject and predicate in binominative sentences) Uspenskij V. A. Trudy po nematematike. Vol. 1. Moscow: OGI, 2002. (Izvestiya AN SSSR. Ser. literatury i yazyka. Vol. 38. 1979. Pp. 349—360).]
  2. 2. Croft 2001 — Croft W. Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2001.
  3. 3. Dowty 1991 — Dowty D. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language. 1991. Vol. 67. No. 3. Pp. 547—619.
  4. 4. Franks, Lavine 2006 — Franks S., Lavine J. E. Case and word order in Lithuanian. Journal of linguistics. 2006. Vol. 42. No. 1. Pp. 239—298.
  5. 5. Haspelmath 2001 — Haspelmath M. Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects. (Typological studies in language 46.) Aikhenvald A., Dixon R. M. W., Onishi M. (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001. Pp. 53—84.
  6. 6. Keenan, Comrie 1977 — Keenan E., Comrie B. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic inquiry. 1977. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp. 63—99.
  7. 7. Levin 1993 — Levin B. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1993.
  8. 8. Livitz 2006 — Livitz I. What’s in a nominative? Implications of Russian non-nominative subjects for a cross-linguistic approach to subjecthood. B. A. Honor’s Thesis, Harvard Univ., 2006.
  9. 9. Lambrecht 2000 — Lambrecht K. When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence focus constructions across languages. Studies in language. 2000. Vol. 24. No. 3. Pp. 611—682.
  10. 10. Matushansky 2008 — Matushansky O. A case study of predication. Studies in formal Slavic linguistics. (Contributions from formal description of Slavic languages. 6.5.) Marušič F., Žaucer R. (eds). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2008. Pp. 213—239.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library