Методологический анализ и развитие экономической науки
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Методологический анализ и развитие экономической науки
Annotation
PII
S086904990000617-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
42-53
Abstract
The methodological research’s productivity for economics’ development is discussed. Particularly,the propositions about methodological individualism principle attenuation and the public interests ofsocial entities’ existence beyond the interests of individuals are critically analyzed. Basing on theproperty of economy as refl ective system the methodological underestimation of agent-based modelingis proved.
Keywords
economic methodology, economics, methodological individualism, public interests, government, refl ective system, agent-based modeling
Date of publication
17.07.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1138
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Avtonomov V.S. Za chto ehkonomisty ne lyubyat metodologov? (vstupitel'naya stat'ya k knige) // Blaug M. Metodologiya ehkonomicheskoj nauki. M., 2004.
Anan'in O.I. Struktura ehkonomiko-teoreticheskogo znaniya. Metodologicheskij analiz. M., 2005.
Anan'in O.I. Ehkonomicheskaya teoriya – ditya krizisov? // XII Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ehkonomiki i obschestva. V 4 kn. Kn. 4. M., 2012.
Balatskij E. V. Mirovaya ehkonomicheskaya nauka na sovremennom ehtape: krizis ili proryv? // Naukovedenie. 2001. № 2.
Bakhtizin A.R. Agent-orientirovannye modeli ehkonomiki. M., 2008.
Blaug M. Neslozhnyj urok ehkonomicheskoj metodologii // THESIS. 1994. Vyp. 4.
Blaug M. Trevozhnye protsessy v sovremennoj ehkonomicheskoj teorii. Chem na samom dele zanimayutsya ehkonomisty // K voprosu o tak nazyvaemom “krizise” ehkonomicheskoj nauki. M., 2002.
Boldyrev I.A. Ehkonomicheskaya metodologiya segodnya: kratkij obzor osnovnykh napravlenij // Zhurnal Novoj ehkonomicheskoj assotsiatsii. 2011. № 9.
Budon R. Mesto besporyadka. Kritika teorij sotsial'nogo izmeneniya. M., 1998.
B'yukenen D. Izbrannye trudy. M., 1997.
Zoidov K.Kh. K probleme sozdaniya sinteticheskoj teorii preodoleniya transformatsionnogo krizisa // Ehkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoj Rossii. 2002. № 2.
Kolpakov V.A. Ehkonomicheskaya teoriya v poiskakh novoj paradigmy // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2008. № 1.
Lefevr V.A. Konfliktuyuschie struktury. M., 1973.
Makarov V.L. Iskusstvennye obschestva // Ehkonomika i matematicheskie metody. 2012. T. 48. № 3.
Makasheva N.A. Neskol'ko slov o metodologii // Istoriya ehkonomicheskikh uchenij. M., 2001.
Mizes L. fon. Chelovecheskaya deyatel'nost'. Traktat po ehkonomicheskoj teorii. Chelyabinsk, 2005.
Polterovich V.M. Krizis ehkonomicheskoj teorii // Ehkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoj Rossii. 1998. № 1.
Polterovich V.M. Stanovlenie obschego sotsial'nogo analiza // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2011. № 2.
Popper K.R. Logika sotsial'nykh nauk // Ehvolyutsionnaya ehpistemologiya i logika sotsial'nykh nauk. Karl Popper i ego kritiki. M., 2000.
Rubinshtejn A.Ya. Vvedenie v novuyu metodologiyu ehkonomicheskogo analiza. M., 2012b.
Rubinshtejn A.Ya. Sotsial'nyj liberalizm: k voprosu ehkonomicheskoj metodologii // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2012a. № 6.
Soros Dzh. Alkhimiya finansov. M., 1996.
Tambovtsev V.L. O krizise v ehkonomicheskoj nauke // Ehkonomicheskij vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2003. T. 1. № 3.
Tambovtsev V.L. Formal'noe i neformal'noe v upravlenii ehkonomikoj. M., 1990.
Khudokormov A.G. Razvitie ehkonomicheskoj mysli cherez ee periodicheskie krizisy (k voprosu ob obschem printsipe ehvolyutsii mirovoj ehkonomicheskoj teorii v XX veke). M., 2012.
Bell D., Kristol I. The Crisis in Economic Theory. New York, 1981.
Che Y.-K. Revolving Doors and the Optimal Tolerance for Agency Collusion // Rand Journal of Economics. 1995.Vol. 26. № 3.
Cohen J.E. The Dynamics of the “Revolving Door” on the FCC // American Journal of Political Science. 1986. Vol. 30. № 4.
Dix G., Klaassen P. Economics: a Science in Crisis? // Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy. 2010. Issue 3.
Frank A.G. The Economics of Crisis and the Crisis of Economics // Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory. 1978. Vol. 9. Issue 1.
Ghoshal S., Moran P. Bad for Practice: a Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory // Academy of Management Review. 1996. Vol. 21. № 1.
Gormley W.T. A Test of the Revolving Door Hypothesis at the FCC // American Journal of Political Science. 1979. Vol. 23. № 4.
Kirman A. The Economic Crisis is a Crisis for Economic Theory // CESifo Economic Studies. 2010. Vol. 56. № 4.
Kotios A., Galanos G. The International Economic Crisis and the Crisis of Economics // World Economy. 2012. Vol. 35. Issue 7.
Krugman P. How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? // The New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?_r=1. 02.09.2009).
Lawson T. A Realist Perspective on Contemporary “Economic Theory’’ // Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. XXIX. № 1. March. 1995.
Lawson T. The Current Economic Crisis: its Nature and the Course of Academic Economics // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2009. Vol. 33. № 4.
Lawson T. Reorienting Economics. London–New York, 2003.
Lebowitz M.A. The Current Crisis of Economic Theory // Science & Society. 1973. Vol. 37. № 4.
March J.G., Simon H.A. Organizations. New York, 1958.
McGuire M.C., Olson M. The Economics of Autocracy and Majority Rule: the Invisible Hand and the Use of Force // Journal of Economic Literature. 1996. Vol. 34. № 1.
Milgrom P.R., Roberts D.J. An Economic Approach to Influence Activities in Organizations // American Journal of Sociology. 1988. Vol. 94 (Supplement).
Olson M. Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development // American Political Science Review. 1993. Vol. 87. № 3.
Pierce J.L.; Kostova T.; Dirks K.T. The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research // Review of General Psychology. 2003. Vol 7. № 1.
Robinson J. The Second Crisis of Economic Theory // American Economic Review. 1972. Vol. 62. № 1/2.
Santos J.F. All Managers Have a Theory of the Firm. Faculdade de Economia e Gestão, Universidade Católica Portuguesa (Porto), WP 97-005. 1997.
Stiglitz J. Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics // American Economic Review. 2002. Vol. 92. № 3.
Towards a Renewal of Economics as a Social Science. 104 Professors of the German-speaking World Issue Memorandum for Paradigmatic Openness and the Integration of Ethical Refl ection into Economics. Berlin, March 13, 2012 (http://www.mem-wirtschaftsethik.de/fi leadmin/user_upload/mem-denkfabrik/2012/Memorandum_Renewal_Economics.pdf).
Weber M. Economy and Society. Berkeley, 1968.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate