Issue 10 :: The preventive role of the criminal court is an archaism or reality? - Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk

Home>Issue 10>The preventive role of the criminal court is an archaism or reality?

The preventive role of the criminal court is an archaism or reality?

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

The preventive role of the criminal court is an archaism or reality?

Annotation

PII

S1026-94520000616-5-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Vladimir Azarov Send message Viktoriia Konstantinova

Edition

Issue 10

Pages

66-73

Abstract

The article considers the modern role of the criminal court in the prevention of crime, and this kind of court decisions, as a special ruling (decision). Argued that preventive judicial activity, although insufficient, but claimed by practice. In connection with the above proposals on changing legislation in order to improve its efficiency.

Keywords

the preventive role of the court, special ruling (decision) on criminal cases, court decision, criminal procedure.

Date of publication

01.10.2015

Number of purchasers

1

Views

1050

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Azarov V., Konstantinova V. The preventive role of the criminal court is an archaism or reality? // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2015. – Issue 10 C. 66-73 .
MLA	Azarov, Vladimir, Konstantinova, Viktoriia "The preventive role of the criminal court is an archaism or reality?." Gosudarstvo i pravo. 10 (2015).:66-73.
APA	Azarov V., Konstantinova V. (2015). The preventive role of the criminal court is an archaism or reality?. Gosudarstvo i pravo. no. 10, pp.66-73

References

Additional sources and materials

1. Velichko A.N., Shatilovich S.N. Profilakticheskaya deyatel'nost' suda i ee mesto v sisteme preduprezhdeniya prestuplenij//Ross. sud'ya. 2006. № 1. S. 13. 
 
 2. Gus'kova A.P. Sudebnaya zaschita konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod cheloveka, grazhdanina posredstvom ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva//Uchen. zapiski. Sb. nauch. tr. yurid. fak-ta Orenburgskogo gos. un-ta. Vyp. 2. T. 2. Orenburg, 2005. S. 3. 
 
 3. Zdes' i dalee po tekstu stat'i pri upominanii opredelenij imeyutsya v vidu takzhe i postanovleniya. 
 
 4. Burmagin S.V. Rol' i pravovoe polozhenie suda v sovremennom rossijskom ugolovnom protsesse. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Vladimir, 2009. S. 464 
 
 5. Galakhova A.V. Bol'she vnimaniya realizatsii polozhenij Konstitutsii RF i UK RF o preduprezhdenii prestuplenij v sudebnoj praktike//Ross. sud'ya. 2008. № 11. S. 44; i dr.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review

Translate