Abstract
Statistics on the efficiency and quality of the judicial systems of the Member States of the Council of Europe is mixed. Moreover, differences in the structure and principles of functioning judicial systems do not allow for a full comparative analysis and make correct conclusions. A similar conclusion can be made in the analysis of the judicial systems of Eastern European States, as they are called in Europe, or the post-Soviet, as they have (Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Latvia, Lithuania, Russia, Ukraine, Estonia) despite the fact that recently the judiciary in particular and order of these countries as a whole were one within the USSR. Indeed, more recently, in these countries there similar institutions of the judiciary: the de facto centralized judicial system, despite the federal structure of the Soviet state. To date statistical data discussed in this paper demonstrate that between the States at the moment there is no unity in the organization of the judiciary, despite the existence in the recent past, the general common standards and principles ofjudicial organization.
Keywords
efficiency of justice, Council of Europe, Commission of the Council of Europe, the post-soviet space, judicial system, performance evaluation, quantitative, information technology in court
Comments
No posts found