Везде
Value-target regulations and emergence in the existential projection of the digital world
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Value-target regulations and emergence in the existential projection of the digital world
Annotation
PII
S2413-90840000617-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Tatiana G. Leshkevich 
Edition
Volume 25 Issue 2
Pages
131-144
Abstract
The article provides insight on methodological tools of post-nonclassical science from existential perspective using the example of such concepts as value-target regulations and emergence. The main goal of the article is to expand the philosophical analysis of these methodological tools by studying their transformations in the digital age. The article considers four dimensions. Firstly, it exposes the existential projection of post-nonclassical concepts. Secondly, it defines the features of value-target regulations in relation to the semantics of purpose and value. Thirdly, the article reveals the specifics of the value system transformation in the digital age. Fourthly, it analyzes the concept of emergence in the context of contemporary realities. The author identifies significant vectors of transformations in value-target regulations, among which are the priorities of technosocialization and developing digital skills; Big Data technology development and datafication. “Double updating” patterns, simulated info-presentation and multitasking characterize behavioral digital transformations. Mental transformations are based on the expanded capabilities of brain, due to the existing trends of integration with intelligent systems. The author comes to the following conclusions. Firstly, the existential projection of post-non-classical methodological tools consists in the need for a reflective analysis of goals in relation to values. This helps to bridge the gap between the logical-conceptual abstractness of methodological tools and the problems of human existence. Secondly, at present, when digital technologies are becoming the structural element of modernity, their implementation requires active subjectivity aimed at discovering the true meaning of events and affecting the use of technological innovations. Thirdly, in spite of the fact that emergence effect is inevitable, value-target regulations contribute to the introduction of “strategic reason”, humanitarian priorities and initiatives intolife practices.
Keywords
concepts of post-nonclassical science, value-target regulations, transformation of digital values, emergence, existential projection
Date of publication
01.12.2020
Number of purchasers
12
Views
385
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Arshinov, V.I. “Slozhnostnyj mir i ego nablyudatel’” [Complexity World And Its Observer], Philosophy, Methodology and History of Science / Filosofiya, metodologiya i istoriya nauki, 2015, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 86‒99. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Belli, L. Network Self-Determination and the Positive Externalities of Community Networks, 2017 [http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ dspace/ handle/ 10438/19924, accessed on 26.06.2020].
    3. 

  3. Ceri, S. “On the Big Impact of ‘Big Computer Science’”, in: Informatics in the Future. Proceedings of the 11th European Computer Science Summit (ECSS 2015), October 2015, Vienna, pp. 17‒18.
    4. 

  4. Clark, A. Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2004. 240 pр.
    5. 

  5. Descombes, V. Sovremennaya francuzskaya filosofiya [Contemporary French Philosophy]. Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ., 2000. 344 pр. (In Russian)
    6. 

  6. Kagan, M.S. Filosofskaya teoriya cennostej [Philosophical Theory of Values]. St. Petersburg: TOO TK Petropolis Publ., 1997. 205 pp. (In Russian)
    7. 

  7. Kasavina, N.A. Ekzistencial’nyj opyt kak problema filosofii i social’no-gumanitarnyh nauk [Existential experience as a problem of philosophy and social sciences], Abstract of dissertation for the degree of Doctor. Philos. Sciences. Moscow: 2017. 30 pp. (In Russian)
    8. 

  8. Knyazeva, E.N. “Enaktivizm: konceptual’nyj povorot v epistemologii” [Anactivism: a conceptual turn in epistemology], Voprosy Filosofii, 2013, no. 10, pp. 91‒105. (In Russian)
    9. 

  9. Knyazeva, E.N., Kurdyumov, S.P. Osnovaniya sinergetiki [Foundations of synergetics]. St. Petersburg: Aletejya Publ., 2002. 414 pp. (In Russian)
    10. 

  10. Lem, C. “Sistemy oruzhiya dvadtat’ pervogoveka” [Weapon systems of the twenty-first century], in: Biblioteka XXI veka [Library of the XXI century]. Moscow: OOO AST Publ., 2003, pp. 550−551. (In Russian)
    11. 

  11. Leshkevich, T.G. “Cifrovye transformacii epohi v proekcii ih vozdejstviya na sovremennogo cheloveka” [Digital Transformation of the Era in the Projection of Their Impact on the Modern Man], Tomsk State University Journal / Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 2019, 439, pp. 103‒109. (In Russian)
    12. 

  12. Leshkevich, T.G. “Vektor modifikacii metodologii: sociogumanitarnoe znanie konvergiruet s postneklassikoj” [The vector of methodology modification: convergence of socio-humanitarian knowledge with post-non-classics], Tomsk State University Journal / Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2018, no. 427, pp. 71‒78. (In Russian)
    13. 

  13. Lotze, R.H. Osnovaniya prakticheskoj filosofii [Foundations of practical philosophy]. St. Petersburg, 1882. 87 pp. [https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01003595479#?page=7, accessed on 03.06.2020]. (In Russian)
    14. 

  14. Malineckij, G.G., Posashkov, S.A., Skurlyagin, A.A. “Gumanitarno-tekhnologicheskaya revolyuciya, krizis sovesti, riski i proekty budushchego” [Humanitarian and technological revolution, crisis of conscience, risks and projects of the future], Strategic priorities / Strategicheskie prioritety, 2019, no. 1 (21), pp. 48‒76. (In Russian)
    15. 

  15. Mayer-Schönberger, V., Cukier, K. Bol’shie dannye. Revolyuciya, kotoraya izmenit to, kak my zhivyom, rabotaem i myslim [Big Data. A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think], trans. by I. Gaydjuk. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov, Ferber Publ., 2014. 240 pp. (In Russian)
    16. 

  16. Mehdizadeh, S. “Self-Presentation 2.0: Narcissism and Self Esteem on Facebook”, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2010, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 357‒364.
    17. 

  17. Mes’kov, V.S., Mamchenko, A.A. “Mir informacii kak trinitarnaya model’ universuma. Postneklassicheskaya metodologiya kognitivnoj deyatel’nosti” [World of Information as Trinitarian Model of Universe. Post-nonclassical methodology of cognitive activity], Voprosy filosofii, 2010, pp. 57‒68. (In Russian)
    18. 

  18. Miller, V. “New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture. Convergence”, The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 2008, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 387‒400.
    19. 

  19. Moren, E. Metod. Priroda Prirody [Method. The Nature of Nature], trans. by H.N. Knyazeva. Moscow: Canon+ Publ., 2013. 487 pp. (In Russian)
    20. 

  20. Nalimov, V.V. V poiskah inyh smyslov [In search of other meanings]. Moscow: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives, 2013, 464 pp. (In Russian)
    21. 

  21. Noë, А. Out of Our Heads. Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang, 2009. 232 pр.
    22. 

  22. Nowotny H. “The Increase of Complexity and its Reduction: Emergent Interfaces between the Natural Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences”, Theory, culture and social sciences, 2005, vol. 22. pp. 15‒31.
    23. 

  23. Rikkert, G. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul’ture [Nature Sciences and Culture Sciences]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 1998. 413 pp. (In Russian)
    24. 

  24. Roubal, O. “Fast-Time Digital Age and Lifestyle Changes in Marketing Identity. Digital Life”, in: Conference Proceedings from International Scientific Conference, 10 th−11th November 2015, Trnava, pp. 206‒219.
    25. 

  25. Ruppert, E., Law, J., Savage, M. “Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices”, Theory, Culture & Society. Special Issue on The Social Life of Methods, 2013, no. 30 (4), pp. 22‒46.
    26. 

  26. Sellen, А., Rogers, Y., Harper, R., Rodden, Т. “Reflecting Human Values in the Digital Age”, Communications of the ACM, 2009, vol. 52, no. 3, pр. 58‒66.
    27. 

  27. Shnurenko, I. “Iskusstvennyj intellect na grani nervnogo sryva” [Artificial intelligence on the verge of a nervous breakdown], Expert / Ekspert, 2018‒2019, no. 1‒3, pp. 38‒41. (In Russian)
    28. 

  28. Skarantino, L.M. “Nasilie i velikodushie: epistemnyj podhod” [Violence and Generosity. Epistemic Approach], Ethic Thought / Eticheskaya mysl’. Iss. 11. Moscow: IFRAN Publ., 2011, pp. 120‒139. (In Russian)
    29. 

  29. Small, G.W., Moody, T.D., Siddarth, P., Bookheimer, S.Y. “Your brain on Google: Patterns of cerebral activation during Internet searching”, American Journal of Geriatric Psychology, 2009, vol. 17, no. 2, pр. 116‒126.
    30. 

  30. Stepin, V.S. “Istoricheskie tipy nauchnoj racional’nosti: problemy demarkacii i preemstvennosti” [Historical types of scientific rationality: problems of demarcation and continuity], Philosophy, Methodology and History of Science / Filosofiya, metodologiya i istoriya nauki, 2015, vol. 1, no. 1. pp. 6‒27. (In Russian)
    31. 

  31. Stepin, V.S. Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki. Izbrannoe [Philosophy and methodology of science. Favorites]. Moscow: Academic project Publ.; Alma Mater Publ., 2015, 716 pp. (In Russian)
    32. 

  32. Urry, J. Sociology beyond Societies. Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London, New York: Routledge, 2000. 255 pp.
    33. 

  33. Wajcman, J. Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015. 224 pp.
    34. 

  34. Windelband, W. Izbpannoe: Duh i istoriya [Favorites: Spirit and History]. Moscow: Lawyer Publ., 1995, 687 pp. (In Russian)
    35.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate