Везде
Socio-humanitarian knowledge: specificity or knowledge of foreign nature?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Socio-humanitarian knowledge: specificity or knowledge of foreign nature?
Annotation
PII
S2413-90840000617-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Natalia M. Smirnova 
Edition
Volume 25 Issue 2
Pages
5-8
Abstract
Specificity of socio-humanitarian knowledge which by now acquires new (scientometric) di­mensions has been presented here as the problem under discussion. Recognizing due polemic overstatements, the author, nevertheless, tries to argue, that the difference between natural sciences and socio-cultural knowledge by no means could be reduced to the so-called specificity, but rather should be bestowed the name “knowledge of foreign nature” due to the principal ontological differences of natural and sociocultural worlds. In contrast to the former, he latter obviously has constitutive meaningful dimension. It has also been demonstrated, that this point of view can be clearly traced back to the European philosophi­cal traditions of XIX−XX centuries.
Keywords
socio-humanitarian knowledge, natural sciences, meaning, ontology, pheno­menology
Date of publication
01.12.2020
Number of purchasers
12
Views
491
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Husserl, E. Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental’naya fenomenologiya. Vvedenie v fenomenologicheskuyu filosofiyu [The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy], trans. by D.V. Kuznitsyna. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2013. 484 pp. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Schutz, A. Izbrannoe. Mir, svetyashchiisya smyslom [Collected papers. Meaning-illuminated World], comp., trans. & ed. by N.M. Smirnovoi. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2004. 1056 pp. (In Russian)
    3.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate