Везде
U.S. POLICY TOWARDS POST-SOVIET INTEGRATION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
U.S. POLICY TOWARDS POST-SOVIET INTEGRATION
Annotation
PII
S268667300000617-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Maxim Bratersky 
Edition
Issue 6 (522)
Pages
3-16
Abstract
Having acknowledged Russian integration projects in Eurasia seriously the United States are now defining their own perception of Russian strategy goals: to what extent is the Russian policy focused on gaining access to the markets and the growth of its economy, and to what degree – on the building a regional political-economic subsystem in Eurasia with the new regional power centre in Moscow.
Date of publication
01.06.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1149
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Avdeeva D.A. i dr. Razrabotka modeli dolgosrochnogo prognozirovaniya osnovnykh makroehkonomicheskikh pokazatelej stran -uchastnits EEhP (Belarusi, Kazakhstana) i Ukrainy. Tsentr razvitiya NIU VShEh. 2012 (http://dcenter.ru/science/DC_CIS_NIR_2012.pdf). 
 2. Vishnyakov A. Kto budet dogonyat' Tamozhennyj Soyuz? (http://www.vrns.ru/analytics/758/#.UMhzxeR1HTo). 
 3. Klotsvog F.N., Sukhotin A.B., Chernova L.S. Prognozirovanie ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii, Belarusi, Kazakhstana i Ukrainy v ramkakh edinogo ehkonomicheskogo prostranstva // Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2009. № 4. S. 26-36. 
 4. Anisimov A.M., Baranovskaya I.V., Vinokurov E.Yu., Geets V.M., Gerasimova E.V., Golikova T.V., Gusev M.S., Ivanter V.V., Kuvalin D.B., Moiseev A.K., Muntiyan V.I., Potapenko V.V., Uzyakov M.N., Frolov I.Eh., Shirov A.A., Shinkaruk L.V., Shinkorenko T.V., Yantovskij A.A. //Kompleksnaya otsenka makroehkonomicheskogo ehffekta razlichnykh form glubokogo ehkonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva Ukrainy so stranami Tamozhennogo soyuza i Edinogo ehkonomicheskogo prostranstva v ramkakh EvrAzEhS. Evrazijskij Bank Razvitiya. 2012 (http://www.eabr.ru/general//upload/reports/Ukraina-resume.pdf). 
 5. Postpred RF pri NATO otvetil na slova Klinton o vossozdanii SSSR (http://actualcomment.ru/news/51097/). 
 6. Putin V.V. Poslanie k Federal'nomu sobraniyu, 12.12.2012 (http://www.rbcdaily.ru/2012/12/12/focus/562949985314962). 
 7. Putin V.V. Novyj integratsionnyj proekt dlya Evrazii -buduschee, kotoroe rozhdaetsya segodnya. 3.10.2011 (http://izvestia.ru/news/502761#ixzz2Ep65v8We). 
 8. Axelrod R., Keohane R. Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions//In: Cooperation under Anarchy/Ed. by K.F. Oye. Princeton, 1986. 246 p. 
 9. Blake Robert O., Jr. Assistant Secretary, Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs, Washington. 25.03.2012. Interview with Al Jazeera TV (http://www.state.gov/p/sca/rls/rmks/2012/187005.htm). 
 10. Boh A. Regionalism in Central Asia: New Geopolitics, Old Regional Order//International Affairs. 2004. Vol. 80. No. 3. P. 485-502. 
 11. Buszynski L. Russia's New Role in Central Asia//Asian Survey. 2005. Vol. 45. No. 4. P. 546-565. 
 12. Clinton Calls Eurasian Integration an Effort to 'Re-Sovietize' (http://www.rferl.org/content/clinton-calls-eurasian-integration-effort-to-resovietize/24791921.html). 
 13. Cohen B. The Political Economy of Currency Regions//The Political Economy of Regionalism. Ed. by D. Mansfield, H. Milner.?? New York, 1997, P. 50-76. 
 14. De Aenlle C. That Bright Light May Be Deceiving//The New York Times. 8.01.2012. 
 15. Deutch K.W. et al. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, 1957. 228 p. 
 16. Gardiner N., Bromund T.R. Five Conservative Principles that Should Guide U.S. Policy on Europe. The Heritage Foundarion. Issue Brief No. 3524. 
 17. Gleason G. The Uzbek Expulsion U.S. Forces and in Central Asia // Problems of Post-Communism. 2006. Vol. 53. No. 2. P. 49-60; Clover C. Dreams of the Eurasian Heartland - The Reemergence of Geopolitics // Foreign Affairs. 1999. Vol. 78. No. 9. 
 18. Gowa J., Mansfield E. Power Politics and International Trade//American Political Science Review. 1993. Vol. 87. P. 408-420. 
 19. Krugman P. Regionalism versus Multilateralism: Analytical Notes//New Dimensions in Regional Integration/J. De Melo, A. Panagariya (eds.). New York, 1993. P. 58-89. 
 20. Lipsey R. The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Survey//Economic Journal. 1960. Vol. 70. P. 496-513. 
 21. Lundestad G. «Empire» by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945-1997. New York, and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. 260 p. 
 22. Mankoff J. What a Eurasian Union Means for Washington//National Interest. 19.04.2012. 
 23. Mansfield D., Milner H. The Political Economy of Regionalism. New York, 1997. 280 p. 
 24. Meade J.E. The Theory of Customs Unions. Amsterdam, 1955. 121 p. 
 25. Nuland Victoria, Spokesperson. Daily Press Briefing. Washington. 11.12. 2012 (http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2012/12/201811.htm#RUSSIA). 
 26. Nye J.S. Peace in Parts: Integration and Conflict in Regional Organization. Boston, 1971. 210 p. 
 27. Palan R. Transnational Theories of Order and Change: Heterodoxy in International Relation Scholarship//Review of International Studies. April 2007. Vol. 33, Supplement, Critical International Relations Theory after 25 Years. P. 47-69. 
 28. Viner J. The Customs Union Issue. New York, 1950. 557 p.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate