References

Additional sources and materials

1. Stepanov G. V. O granitsakh lingvisticheskogo i literaturovedcheskogo analiza khudozhestvennogo teksta.— IAN SLYa, 1980, № 3, s. 195.
 2. Stepanov Yu. S. Imena, predikaty, predlozheniya (Semiologicheskaya grammatika). M., 1981, s. 23.
 3. Arutyunova Ya . D. Faktor adresata.— IAN SLYa, 1981, № 4.
 4. Losev A. F. O ponyatii yazykovoj valentnosti.— IAN SLYa, 1981, № 5.
 5. Potebnya A. A. Mysl' i yazyk.— V kn.: Potebnya A. A. Ehstetika i poehtika. M., 1976.
 6. Henson R. What we say.— American philosophical quarterly, 1965, v. 2, N 1.
 7. Kronasser H. Handbuch der Semasiologie. Heidelberg, 1952.
 8. Kondil'yak Eh. B. de. Traktat o sistemakh.— V kn.: Kondil'yak Eh. B. de. Soch. v 3-kh t. M., 1982, t. 2.
 9. Voloshinov V. N. Marksizm i filosofiya yazyka. Osnovnye problemy sotsiologicheskogo metoda v nauke o yazyke. L., 1929.
 10. Khamskij N. Sintaksicheskie struktury.— V kn.: Novoe v lingvistike. Vyp. II. M., 1962.
 11. Lehnert W. G. The role of scripts in understanding.— In: Frame conceptions and text understanding. Berlin — New York, 1980, p. 83.
 12. Naess A. A necessary component of logic: Empirical argumentation analysis.— In: Argumentation: Approaches to the theory formation. Amsterdam, 1982, p. 20—21.
 13. KuToda S.-Y. Indexed predicate logic.— In: Chicago Linguistic Society. Papers from
 the 17th regional meeting. Chicago,1981, p . 162.
 14. Tselischev V. V. Filosofskie problemy semantiki vozmozhnykh mirov. Novosibirsk,
 1977.
 15. Zvegintsev V. A. O tsel'nooformlennosti edinits teksta.— IAN SLYa, 1980, № 1.
 16. Likhachev D. S. Poehtika drevnerusskoj literatury. M., 1979.
 17. Gardiner A. The theory of speech and language. Oxford, 1932.
 18. Potebnya A. A. Iz zapisok po russkoj grammatike. T. I—P . M., 1958.
 19. ffusserl E. Logische Untersuchungen. Bd. 2 — Untersuchungen zur Phanomenologie
 und Theorie der Erkenntnis. I. Teil. 2. Aufl. Halle (Saale), 1913, S. 74.
 20. Anderson J. M. The grammar of case: Towards a localistic theory. London, 1971.
 21. Talmy L. Figure and ground in complex sentences.— In: Universals of human language. V. 4. Syntax. Stanford, 1978.
 22. Gochet P. Pragmatique formelle: theorie desmodeles et competence pragma tique.—
 In: Le langage en contexte. Etudes philosophiques et linguistiques de pragmatique.
 Amsterdam, 1980. p. 328.
 23. Hartmann P. Zur kategoriellen Grundlegung der Syntax.— In: Miinchener Studien
 zur Sprachwissenschaft. Bd. 12. Miinchen, 1958, S. 49.
 24. Raphael B. SIR: Semantic information retrieval.— In: Semantic information processing. Cambridge (Mass.), 1969, p. 33—35.
 25. Boost K. Neue Untersuchungen zum Wesen und zur Struktur des deutschen Satzes:
 Der Satz als Spannungsfeld. Berlin, 1955.
 26. Johnson W. People in quandaries. New York, 1946, p. 91.
 27. Zvegintsev V. A. Predlozhenie i ego otnoshenie k yazyku i rechi. M., 1976.
 28. Dzhokhadze D. Z?., Styazhkin N. I. Vvedenie v istoriyu zapadnoevropejskoj srednevekovoj filosofii. Tbilisi, 1981, s. 155.
 29. Stepanov Yu. S. V poiskakh pragmatiki (Problema sub'ekta).— IAN SLYa, 1981,
 № 4.
 30. Schank R. S. Predictive understanding.— In: Recent advances in the psychology of
 language. Formal and experimental approaches. New York, 1978.
 31. Zammuner V. L, Speech production. Strategies in discourse planning. Hamburg,
 1981, p. 35.
 32. Paul' G. Printsipy istorii yazyka, M., 1960.
 33. Tdnisson I. J. Some remarks about the connection between meaning and understanding.— In: Sprache, Logik und Philosophie. Wien, 1980, S. 547.
 34. Vitgenshtejn L. Logiko-filosofskij traktat. M., 1958.
 35. Cresswell M. J. Logics and languages. London, 1973.
 36. Iloldcroft D. Words and deeds. Problems in the theory of speech acts. Oxford, 1978.
 37. Khiptikka Ya. Kvantory, yazykovye igry i transtsendental'nye rassuzhdeniya.—
 V kn.: Khintikka Ya. Logiko-ehpistemologicheskie issledovaniya. M., 1980, s. 289.
 38. Wolski W. Schlechtbestimmtheitund Vagheit: Tendenzen und Perspektiven. Tubingen, 1980, S. 191.
 39. Dem'yankov V.Z. Konventsii, pravila i strategii obscheniya (interpretiruyuschij
 podkhod k argumentatsii).— IAN SLYa, 1982, № 4.
 40. RyU G. Use and usage.— Philosophical review, 1953, v. 62.
 41. Chomsky N. On the generative enterprise. Dordrecht, 1982, p. 12.
 42. Searle J. Minds, brains, and programs.— In: The behavioral and brain sciences,
 1980, v. 3, № 3.
 43. Zwicky A., Sadock J. Ambiguity tests and how to fail them. — In: Syntax and semantics. V. 4. New York, 1975, p. 3.
 44. Moore /., Newell A. How can MERLIN understand.— In: Knowledge and cognition.
 Potomac, 1974.
 45. Simon H. A. Models of thought. New Haven — London, 1979, p. 447.
 46. Yjm X. Ehpizody v strukture diskursa.— V kn.: Predstavlenie znanij i modelirovanie protsessov ponimaniya. Novosibirsk, 1980.
 47. Garrett M. Experimental issues in sentence comprehension.— In: Pragmatic aspects
 of human communication. Dordrecht, 1974.
 48. Dowty D. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrect, 1979.
 49. Firth J. R. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930—1955.— In: Firth J. R. Studies in
 linguistic analysis. Oxford, 1957, p. 28.
 50. Firth J. R. The treatment of language in general linguistics.— In: Firth J. R. Studies in linguistic analysis. Oxford, 1957.
 51. Dijk T. A. van. Studies in the pragmatics of discourse. The Hague, 1981, p. 217.
 52. Gegel' G. V. F. Filosofiya dukha.— V kn.: Gegel' G. V. F* Ehntsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 3. M., 1977, s. 186.
 53. Chamiak E. Ms Malaprop, a language comprehension program. — In: Frame conceptions and text understanding. Berlin — New York, 1980, p. 62.
 54. Vossler K, Gesammelte Aufsatze sur Sprachphilosophie. Mbnchen, 1923, S. 186.
 55. Raffler-Engel W. The implications of hearer background on the perception of the message.— In: Angewandte Soziolinguistik. Tubingen, 1981, S. 47.
 56. Rentier / . E. Some repairs on the notion of repairs in the interest of relevance.— In:
 Chicago linguistic society. Papers from the 14th regional meeting. Chicago, 1978,
 p. 392.