Везде
The practice of applying the activity approach and implementing the methodology of interdisciplinarity in the 60‒70 years of the twentieth century
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The practice of applying the activity approach and implementing the methodology of interdisciplinarity in the 60‒70 years of the twentieth century
Annotation
PII
S2413-90840000617-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Galina Stepanova 
Edition
Volume 25 Issue 2
Pages
116-130
Abstract
Two tasks are posed in the article: first, to pay attention to the productivity of applying the activity approach in specific research and design practices of the 60‒70s of the XX cen­tury, and secondly, to analyze the possibilities of implementing the interdisciplinarity methodology in them. The sources and application of the activity approach developed in So­viet philosophy and psychology are examined, its modern criticism is given. The experience of developing interdisciplinarity is analyzed in projects implemented on the basis of the sys­tem-activity approach of E.G. Yudin for organizing ergonomic research and development, as well as formulated by E.V. Ilyenkov ideas about the activities and the emergence of con­sciousness on the example of the Zagorsky experiment. The fact that ergonomic studies of the second half of the last century became an experimental basis for both the study and design of activities, and the development of interdisciplinary practices is justified. The inter­disciplinary interaction between philosophers, psychologists and teachers in the process of the Zagorsky experiment influenced the refinement of philosophical concepts of the nature of the ideal, its subjective forms and, in general, human consciousness The productivity of organizing special interdisciplinary research, projects and developments based on the imple­mentation of an activity approach with the participation of specialists from different fields of knowledge studying a person is substantiated. The problem of interdisciplinarity, its origins, and modern ideas are discussed. The content of the concept of projectivity as an orientation towards the search for innovative solutions in uncertain situations, the ability to set goals, model and design a new reality is analyzed. It is concluded that interdisciplinarity and pro­jectivity can be realized both in a strictly organized project or study, and in a communicative space in which the goals and objectives for all participants in the dialogue are not clearly formulated.
Keywords
activity, consciousness, personality, activity approach, ergonomics, methodology, interdisciplinarity, projectivity, Zagorsky experiment
Date of publication
01.12.2020
Number of purchasers
12
Views
452
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Aktual’nye problemy psihologii truda, inzhenernoj psihologii i ergonomiki [Actual problems of labor psychology, engineering psychology and ergonomics]. Moscow: Moscow University Publ., 1980. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Asmolov, A.G. Psihologiya lichnosti [Psychology of Personality]. Moscow: Moscow State University Press, 1990. [http://pedlib.ru/Books/2/0390/2_0390‒64.shtml, accessed on 29.03.2020]. (In Russian)
    3. 

  3. Borzenkov, V.G., Yudin, B.G. “Metodologicheskie osnovaniya kompleksnogo izucheniya cheloveka” [Methodological foundations of a complex study of man], in: Mnogomernyj obraz cheloveka [Multidimensional image of man]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2001, pp. 17‒31. (In Russian)
    4. 

  4. Davydov, V.V. Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Theory of Developmental Learning]. Moscow: INTOR Publ., 1996. 544 pp. (In Russian)
    5. 

  5. Dubrovsky, D.I. “Psihicheskie yavleniya i mozg” [Mental phenomena and the brain], Website of D.I. Dubrovsky [http://www.dialog21.ru/dubrovsky/nauchnye_texty/psihicheskie_javlenia6.htm, accessed on 23.03.2020] (In Russian)
    6. 

  6. Frolov, I.T. “Sovremennaya nauka i gumanizm” [Modern science and humanism], Voprosy filosofii, 1973, no. 3, pp. 3‒15. (In Russian)
    7. 

  7. Genisaretskiy, O.I. “Deyatel’nost’ proektirovaniya i proektnaya kul’tura” [Design activities and design culture], Gumanitarnyj portal [Humanitarian portal], 2007. [https://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/2007/2692, accessed on 12.04.2020]. (In Russian)
    8. 

  8. Hoziev, V.B. “O validnosti formiruyushchego metoda” [On the validity of the formative method], Voprosy psihologii, 2002, no. 5, pp. 59‒69. (In Russian)
    9. 

  9. Ilyenkov, E.V. “Psihika i mozg (Otvet D.I. Dubrovskomu)” [Mind and brain (Answer to D.I. Dubrovsky)], Voprosy filosofii, 1968, no. 11, pp. 145‒155. [http://caute.ru/ilyenkov/texts/vf/psycer.html, accessed on 23.02.2020]. (In Russian)
    10. 

  10. Ilyenkov, E.V. “Stanovlenie lichnosti: k itogam nauchnogo eksperimenta” [The formation of personality: to the results of a scientific experiment], Kommunist, 1977, no. 2, pp. 68‒79. [http://caute.ru/ilyenkov/texts/genpers.html, accessed on 23.02.2020]. (In Russian)
    11. 

  11. Ilyenkov, E.V. “Ideal’noe” [Ideal], in: Eval’d Vasil’evich Il’enkov [Evald Vassilievich Ilyenkov], ed. by V.I. Tolstyh. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2009. 432 pp. (In Russian)
    12. 

  12. Kasavin, I.T. “Mezhdisciplinarnye issledovaniya i social’naya kartina mira” [Interdisciplinary research and the social picture of the world], Filosofiya nauki, 2014, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 9‒26[https://iphras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/ps/ps19/9‒26.pdf, accessed on 12.04.2020]. (In Russian)
    13. 

  13. Kiseleva, M.S. “Gumanitarnye Issledovaniya I Proektivnost’: Disciplinarnye I Mezhdisciplinarnye Strategii Znaniya” [Humanities Research and Projectivity: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Strategies of Knowledge], Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki [Proceedings of Kazan University. Humanities Series], 2016, vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 1163‒1172. (In Russian)
    14. 

  14. Kiseleva, M.S. “Problemy mezhdisciplinarnosti v gumanitarnom znanii o cheloveke: idei i praktiki B.G. YUdina” [Problems of interdisciplinarity in human knowledge: ideas and practices by Boris Yudin], Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki, 2019, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 5‒20. (In Russian)
    15. 

  15. Lektorsky, V.A. “Deyatel’nostnyj podhod: smert’ ili vozrozhdenie?” [The proactive approach: death or rebirth?], Voprosy filosofii, 2001, no. 2, pp. 56‒65. (In Russian)
    16. 

  16. Lektorsky, V.A. “Sovremennye problemy vzaimodejstviya filosofii, psihologii i kognitivnyh tekhnologij: k 85-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V.P. Zinchenko. Materialy ‛kruglogo stola’” [Modern problems of interaction of philosophy, psychology and cognitive technologies: to the 85th anniversary of V.P. Zinchenko’s birth. The materials of the “round table”], Voprosy filosofii, 2016, no. 9, pp. 5‒35. [http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1479&Itemid=52, accessed on 13.03.2020]. (In Russian)
    17. 

  17. Leontiev, A.N. Deyatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 1975. 304 pp. (In Russian)
    18. 

  18. Malinovsky, P.V. “Issledovanie kak professiya” [Research as a profession], Issledovanie (Podmoskov'e, iyul’ 2002 g.) [Research (Moscow region, July 2002)]. [http://www.shkp.ru/lib/-archive/second/investigations/5, accessed on 13.04.2020]. (In Russian)
    19. 

  19. Meshcheryakov, A.I. Slepogluhonemye deti [Deaf-mute children]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., 1974. 328 pp. (In Russian)
    20. 

  20. Rubinstein, S.L. “Problemy psihologii v trudah Karla Marksa” [Psychology problems in the Karl Marx works], Voprosy psihologii, 1983, no. 2, pp. 9‒25. [http://scepsis.net/library/id_ 2041.html, accessed on 13.03.2020]. (In Russian)
    21. 

  21. Rubinstein, S.L. Principy i puti razvitiya psihologii [Principles and ways of development of psychology]. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1959. 356 pp. (In Russian)
    22. 

  22. Rubinstein, S.L. Osnovy obshchej psihologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. Saint Petersburg: “Piter” Publ., 2000. [http://psylib.org.ua/books/rubin01/txt01.htm#2, accessed on 13.03.2020]. (In Russian)
    23. 

  23. Semenov, I.N. “Organizacionnaya metodologiya psihologii truda V.M. Munipova i strategicheskoe proektirovanie im ergonomiki i dizajna” [The organizational methodology of the psychology of work of V.M. Munipov and the strategic design of ergonomics and design], Kul’turnoistoricheskaya psihologiya [Cultural and historical psychology], 2013, no. 3, pp. 12‒21. (In Russian)
    24. 

  24. Yudin, E.G. Sistemnyj podhod i princip deyatel’nosti [Systematic approach and principle of activity]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1978. 392 pp. (In Russian)
    25.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate